Triangulation refers to the method of data collection and validation in which two or more data sources are consulted to reach the most accurate conclusion through studying and interpreting a research topic from different perspectives (pp 892, 2008 data). || Used most frequently in case study research, triangulation is described by Weerakkody (2009) as existing in four basic forms: data triangulation, methodological triangulation, theory triangulation, and researcher triangulation. || Data triangulation refers to the use of data from at least two different sources, where they may be a combination of any or all of the following: archival documents and information, research interviews, field studies, and/or physical artifacts (pp . 238). Methodological triangulation, on the other hand, uses different methodologies in the research process to ensure the validity and accuracy of the information collected. || Researcher triangulation means the employment of multiple observers (i.e. researchers) in the research process from data collection, to data analysis and interpretation in order to receive an alternative perspective. It is worth noting that using researcher triangulation does not necessarily mean that all researchers who are working on the research occupy the same importance in the process (pp. 303, Denzin). || Finally, theoretical triangulation denotes the use of combined theoretical paradigms to look at the problem in an organized way for easy (and, with combination, more complete) understanding. || Being a form of mixed research, triangulation shares its characteristics and advantages of its approach. || One of the key features of the mixed method would be that I… center the paper… questions, and allow you to test pre-constructed hypotheses to answer the “how” questions. || Second, blended research bridges the gap between the two methodologies, creating a complementary relationship. Research findings are now better supported by generating numbers to support narratives and vice versa, painting a more complete picture to represent and convince the intended research audience. || Third, it allows for a larger quantity and more complex questions to be answered, as the complement would balance the limitations of both searches. The researcher would not be required to give up one in favor of the other when faced with the selection of research paradigms or methodologies. || The advantages of the mixed method would ultimately provide stronger evidence for the conclusion of the research through corroboration of the findings.