LeadershIp The contemporary leadership we studied was situational, distributed, and collaborative. We researched this because we thought these types of principles would make the game more interesting for players and leaders. I felt that with these principles we would have a chance to show how to apply them effectively, the research we did supposedly explained how each principle worked and how to apply it effectively. Some other examples from the research were that the game that applies most to these principles, the situational one, was capture the flag, in this game you had to catch the ball and bring it to your side, but when the opponent takes the ball from your objective. The team should immediately switch from attacking to defensive, which shows that when a situation changes, the way a person reacts to the change, because distributed was the four-square game where the team with the ball had to let out the other team, in this In the game there was the use of two principles in one collaborative and distributed as an example, some people would have to mark the opponent and work together to get the person out. We used Situational, Distributed, Collaborative, we provided collaborative and distributed results perfectly because we worked among ourselves and with the rest of the class to come up with an outcome because our game wasn't that good and people kept asking if they could change the rules which made us wonder if we needed more time to run our game, given that we only had 50 minutes to play. I felt we all had a say in how to apply Kent's group principles through play. As I went deeper to try and think about how this would affect the game and us as leaders, coming to the conclusion that playing more games that would be high......middle of the card......could be used only when certain situations arose, such as when a person must evolve or reach a balance with the needs of others and maintain their own needs of the game to achieve what was your goal when a person had to get used to changing the rules for the benefit of people playing the game. I thought this principle was really bad to use because of its uses. What is your personal opinion? What happened when specific leadership principles were used? Compare your overall experience as a PAL with the research. Challenge (questions that challenge leadership principles) In my opinion we faced the challenge of time, finalizing our choices of games and how we would work together. how we will work together would be a big problem because we know each other very well, but we have never really worked together and this game would show our flaws.Conclusion