Article 25 of the 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that "Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for health and well-being himself and his children and his family, including food, clothing, shelter, medical care and necessary social services." Article 25 basically says that everyone has a human right to all these resources because these are their civil rights and they are entitled to them. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay That said, many people feel that healthcare is a privilege. Health care should be declared a right and everyone should have the right to adequate health care and not be subjected to medical treatment or not because of their financial situation. For the United States to function properly and have its citizens help and contribute to the social, economic and political goals of this country. Citizens of the United States must be healthy to ensure these goals are achieved. If the American dream is to be realized, healthcare in the country should become a priority. Despite the fact that the government of many different administrations has not addressed the issue of healthcare for all and has ignored it. To definitely ensure healthcare for everyone, it is necessary to reform the entire system. The government must make healthcare for all a priority and must be the facilitator of healthcare to ensure health regardless of a person's economic position because it is a civil right. While some may believe that healthcare is the responsibility of individual citizens, in reality, the government should provide free healthcare to all Americans. The history of healthcare dates back to the 19th century in Germany. In a speech given by Karen S. Palmer, she states: “As the United States continually attempted to adapt and create a functioning health care system, it was always on the cusp but failing to perfect it. The first to start some sort of healthcare system was Germany in 1883, starting with compulsory health insurance. “Who was one of the first workers in the health system. Other European nations such as Austria, Great Britain, and Norway followed until 1912. Sweden joined in 1891, Denmark in 1892, France in 1910, and Switzerland in 1912. However, many European nations had for a while adopted a form of health care. The main reason why all these health care programs in different European countries were activated was the need for income stabilization, as well as protection from loss of wages in case of illness rather than from paying medical expenses. During this time, the federal government left everything related to health care up to individual states. Where states have abandoned them to private or voluntary programs. The United States, however, used some voluntary funds that provided for its members in the event of illness or death. Although there were no legislative or public programs during the late 19th century or early 20th century in the United States (Palmer). Palmer also says, “During this time the Progressive Era loomed over the United States. The reformers did more to improve the social conditions of the working class than any other reform movement such as health care.” However, there was not much working-class support for broad social security in the nation. The Labor and Socialist parties' support for health insurance orsickness funds and benefit programs were much more fragmented than in Europe. Furthermore, the first proposals for health insurance in the country did not enter political debates under anti-socialist patronage as they did in Europe. Although the United States was emerging as a global power, most health care reform initiatives and legislation occurred outside the federal government (Palmer). Efforts to provide Healthcare reform was always discussed in previous presidencies but was not actually implemented until 1945, when President Truman proposed to Congress in November 1945 that the United States needed a new healthcare program. In this proposal, he said, the federal government should play a role in universal health care. Trump has been unable to institute worthwhile healthcare during his presidency. But the next president Lyndon B Johnson was able to establish health care for the elderly and needy. While this appeared to be a stimulus for universal healthcare, it was not quite enough. Middle-class families in the United States were still not provided healthcare and life expectancy was still low. This meant that from that moment on the healthcare reform could only continue. Now, in the 21st century, after the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, or ObamaCare, took effect, he has reformed health insurance with the goal of near-universal coverage. Since ObamaCare provided subsidies, health insurance has been made affordable. ObamaCare emphasized preventative care. This led to more people receiving care before more expensive emergency room care became an option. But now, the Trump administration has made several attempts to pass legislation that would repeal the Affordable Care Act. The current administration weakened the law when it said it would no longer continue to fund a class of widely used subsidies without appropriations from the Congress. ObamaCare was intended to facilitate payments and deductible costs for many low-income Americans who purchased health insurance coverage through the Affordable Care Act. The estimated cost of the payments was 9 billion for the following year and would reach almost 100 billion in the next decade. Many Americans do not agree with the repeal of this law because it has led to many Americans paying for insurance for things that they would not be able to pay for on their own. “Such as insulin, cancer treatments, or medical interventions.” (Amadeo) October 12, 2017, Right now, states have their own specific health care regulations, making it expensive for national insurance companies to do business in different states. As a result, five companies serve half of the insured population in the United States. The President implied that increased competition would diminish monopoly power while lowering costs. Larger companies, however, would be the only ones with the ability to operate across state lines under current policy. “So if it becomes easier for them to do so, they will increase prices. With rising prices, not all Americans would be able to afford healthcare with this new revised approach” (Amadeo). Understanding the context of universal healthcare helps to see how, as the United States developed over the years into a great world power, it was not as focused on becoming a great world power socially and for its people. While other countries have ensured social reform while adopting economic reform. There are many.