The debate over stem cell research has attracted political, religious and social viewpoints and tends to polarize nations. The section supporting stem cell research calls for the potential benefits of treating debilitating conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, Parkinson's disease and spinal cord injuries. Conversely, those who oppose the research argue that stem cells violate the right to life and human dignity. The arguments of both groups raise critical moral principles focused on preventing human suffering and respecting life regardless of developmental stage. The duty to protect human beings from suffering such as disease is a fundamental moral principle. Likewise, granting human life the dignity it deserves is a primary moral principle. Since it is impossible to respect the two principles when carrying out stem cell research, society must take a firm position on this issue. Although it raises moral questions, stem cell research holds great promise for developing cures for many conditions and, therefore, scientists should pursue it. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Stem cell research has the potential to develop cures to treat the most debilitating conditions. Diseases such as heart disease, diabetes and Parkinson's disease, as well as spinal injuries inflict intense suffering on humans. The burden of diabetes and cardiovascular disease is increasing worldwide. Statistics show that approximately seven out of ten people die from chronic diseases in America (Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease). Such diseases disable and reduce the quality of life of Americans. Therefore, medical intervention is worth pursuing to reverse the alarming statistics and ensure Americans have a quality life. Stem cell research promises to cure most of these chronic diseases. The manipulation of embryonic cells for directed differentiation implies that the technology has the potential to discover many cures for most conditions that afflict humans (Dresser 336). Nobody wants to live a short life. It is through medical interventions such as stem cell research that the lives of people suffering from chronic diseases can be extended. Therefore, ardent objections to stem cell research are ill-intentioned and deserve to be condemned. Stem cell research seeks to improve transplant rates. The demand for organ transplants, especially for people with kidney failure, liver, lung and heart disease, is enormous. Many people die waiting for transplants (Sulmasy 68). Likewise, incompatibility of transplanted tissues and organs with recipients' body systems results in death. According to Douglas and Savulescu, stem cell research has the potential to increase the success rate of transplants and prevent deaths resulting from the medical procedure (309). Interestingly, stem cell research induces direct differentiation of cells. In this regard, research can produce tissues that have genetic similarities with recipient cells. Creating cells identical to those of the recipient will solve the problem of transplant rejection. Therefore, stem cell research has the potential to extend people's lives by increasing transplant success rates. Stem cell research promises to offset the demand for.