After the National Council of Resistance of Iran's disclosure of Iran's nuclear activities, the IAEA took steps to consider verifying these claims. Subsequently, the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Mohammad El-Baradei, traveled to Iran to visit Iranian nuclear sites. It has been claimed that Iran's nuclear activities are peaceful, but the United States has rejected that verification. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThe United States has become more vocal in its condemnation of Iran's nuclear program and the Iranian regime and has called on the United Nations Security Council to impose sanctions on Iran. Iranian leaders managed to turn the negotiations into a source of national pride, a cause behind which both conservatives and liberals could rally behind partisan support. Subsequently, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) took the preliminary position to close the accounts on decades of obstacles to the implementation of the July nuclear agreement with world powers to reach an agreement that will represent a milestone in history. Respectively, a resolution passed by the UN watchdog's 35-nation board of governors states that the investigation was conducted in accordance with the agreed agenda and that this closed the committee's consideration of the matter, but The Vienna-based watchdog has been trying to clarify the allegations as recently as 2003. And since Iran had secretly been trying to develop a real nuclear weapon. As a result, on December 2, 2016, the IAEA released its final assessment that, although it had not received all the requested information, some of the allegations were indeed accurate. It states that Iran conducted "a series of activities relevant to the development" of a nuclear bomb before the end of 2003 in a "coordinated effort" and that some activities continued into 2009. International inspectors from the International Agency for The Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) sought not only to continuously monitor every element of Iran's declared nuclear program, but also sought to verify that no fissile material had been secretly transported to a secret location to build a bomb. Furthermore, if IAEA inspectors became aware of a suspicious location, Iran would agree to implement the Additional Protocol to the IAEA Safeguards Agreement, which will allow inspectors to enter and inspect any site they deem suspicious. Such suspicions can be triggered by holes in the ground that could be uranium mines, intelligence reports, unexplained purchases or isotope alerts. Subsequently, in January 2016, International Atomic Energy verified that Iran has completed all necessary steps under which Iran agreed to turn its deeply buried plant in Fordo into a center for scientific research. Another uranium plant, Natanz, will be cut rather than closed. About 5,000 uranium enrichment centrifuges will continue to run there, about half the current number. Iran also agreed to limit enrichment to 3.7% and limit its stockpile of low-enriched uranium to 300 kilograms, or 660 pounds, for 15 years. This was considered insufficient for a bomb attack. Please note: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a custom essay The agreement emphasized that these “did not go beyond feasibility and scientific studies” and that there was no evidence that Iran $ 100.