Political Violence and Gravity with an Orange Revolution Case Study Example | state actors. Political violence is also defined as the use of force by a group of people with political motivations or political purposes. Political violence is defined as violence perpetrated by the government or the people to achieve political objectives. It is described as force and violence used by the state against non-state actors or against another state. It includes a range of events such as protests, non-violent activities and conflict-based flashpoints. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay This essay tries to explain political violence and severity with the example of a case study of well-known revolutions and protests in history such as the Orange Revolution in Ukraine through the lens of explaining ideas and relevant framework such as in the case study. It will do this by first explaining the context, history and reasons of the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, then a detailed analysis will be carried out explaining the theoretical and conceptual framework that will help to understand the important points of the revolution. The Orange Revolution in Ukraine is a country series of protests and political events from the end of November 2004 until January 2005. In 2004, during the presidential elections, a political revolution occurred which turned out to be affected by electoral fraud and corruption with pressure on those who voted for the opposition party.History and contextThere are series and events of demonstrations and protests challenging election fraud and voter intimidation in Ukraine with political corruption after the presidential elections held in 2004. According to information and research of Karatnycky, the initiators of this protest sought to declare fair and free presidential elections. It was thought that these goals could be achieved through strikes, civil resistance and civil disobedience throughout Ukraine. The lack of political elections and fraudulent with the lack of political and economic reforms caused a mass deployment of people resulting in protests and demonstrations during the revolution. Journalist Georgiy Gongadze reportedly targeted the government for corruption and unethical behavior of Ukrainian government politicians. Government authorities targeted Gongadze for exposing the corruption that was happening in the country, while people support Gongadze's case because they believe that the reason why government authorities targeted Gongadze was so they could suppress his freedom of word. Gongadze's case caused public unrest with the murder and kidnapping of the journalist in September 2000. Furthermore, the perception that the Ukrainian authorities were the cause of Gongadze's murder and kidnapping, with the lack of reforms based on political concepts and economic, caused discontent of social and political selection in the post-Soviet era. People's dissatisfaction with their government and authorities gave rise to Viktor Yushchenko challenging economic and political reforms with the opportunity to organize a resistance movement capable of challenging the elite of social and political society. According to Kuzio, the Internet was the basis of the Orange Revolution because it engages participants in the revolution to be informed about developments during the protests. A series of events occurred during that time. These events were depicted with the help of focus groups, interviews and revolutions. The speeches of opposition leaders are also analysed. The events that took place from November 24 to December 3 were of great importance. Based on the protest negotiations and the stalemate that has occurredoccurred among the opposition, the current government forced opposition leader Yanukovych to paralyze the government with nationwide strikes in Ukraine. Likewise, opposition leader Yanukovych was reluctant to make any kind of concessions in favor of the government. Furthermore, the movement of security forces in the capital Kiev could have worsened the situation, but the warning of intelligence and military services throughout Ukraine prevented bloodshed. On December 3, the Supreme Court made the decision on the re-election of Viktor Yanukovych and Viktor Yushchenko. The court ordered the second round of the elections to be repeated within three weeks, but President Kuchma and Yanukovych preferred that the full elections be repeated. The international reaction of the President of the United States of America and the Russian Federation was observed, who agreed that fair and free elections should be held without interference from other international forces that could influence the results of the elections. Conceptual Framework and Theoretical Ideas The Orange Revolution was a one-of-a-kind event in Ukrainian history, however, the outcome followed an example of democratic breakthroughs or “electoral revolutions” already occurred in Georgia in 2003, Serbia in 200, Slovakia in 1998 and Kyrgyzstan in 2005, as some will argue. . All the cases I mentioned shared several characteristics: the catalyst for regime change was a corrupt national election; challengers to office holders sent extraconstitutional intentions to ensure that conventional principles of political play in the constitution were followed; the occupiers and challengers both claimed sovereign authority over a similar region; these progressive events ended without the massive use of violence by the state or the resistance; the end of these electoral uprisings triggered a critical leap in the level of democracy. Researchers have numerous theories of democratization. Seymour Martin Lipset's reflections on modernization as a driver of democratization nevertheless require serious consideration, while other structuralist studies have focused on related but particular factors, such as culture, economic imbalance, geology, and resource endowments. Combating these deterministic clarifications of democratization are actor-centered scholars who focus on the activities and communications of people and elites specifically as the driver of democratization or its demise. Transitologists part ways on two issues: whether cooperation between parts of the old system and democratic challengers is important for democracy-based change, and whether democratization should be seen as a game between elites, or whether social actors and mass should be included in the analysis. The Orange Revolution offers affirmative proof for individuals who emphasize conflict as a driver of democracy-based change and for individuals who assign a central role to organized mass activity in pushing for democratic rule change. According to this theory, democratization occurs not when the appropriation of power is generally equivalent and the two sides are forced to negotiate, but when social forces gain enough power to demand the introduction of democracy or protect it from autocratic violations. democratic power, including the solidarity of the resistance and the ability of the resistance to resist intimidation or to make autocracy costly, especially the ability of society to "coordinate its reactions to prevent violations of rights,.131-145

Topic > Political Violence and Gravity with an Orange Revolution Case Study Example | state actors. Political violence is also defined as the use of force by a group of people with political motivations or political purposes. Political violence is defined as violence perpetrated by the government or the people to achieve political objectives. It is described as force and violence used by the state against non-state actors or against another state. It includes a range of events such as protests, non-violent activities and conflict-based flashpoints. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay This essay tries to explain political violence and severity with the example of a case study of well-known revolutions and protests in history such as the Orange Revolution in Ukraine through the lens of explaining ideas and relevant framework such as in the case study. It will do this by first explaining the context, history and reasons of the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, then a detailed analysis will be carried out explaining the theoretical and conceptual framework that will help to understand the important points of the revolution. The Orange Revolution in Ukraine is a country series of protests and political events from the end of November 2004 until January 2005. In 2004, during the presidential elections, a political revolution occurred which turned out to be affected by electoral fraud and corruption with pressure on those who voted for the opposition party.History and contextThere are series and events of demonstrations and protests challenging election fraud and voter intimidation in Ukraine with political corruption after the presidential elections held in 2004. According to information and research of Karatnycky, the initiators of this protest sought to declare fair and free presidential elections. It was thought that these goals could be achieved through strikes, civil resistance and civil disobedience throughout Ukraine. The lack of political elections and fraudulent with the lack of political and economic reforms caused a mass deployment of people resulting in protests and demonstrations during the revolution. Journalist Georgiy Gongadze reportedly targeted the government for corruption and unethical behavior of Ukrainian government politicians. Government authorities targeted Gongadze for exposing the corruption that was happening in the country, while people support Gongadze's case because they believe that the reason why government authorities targeted Gongadze was so they could suppress his freedom of word. Gongadze's case caused public unrest with the murder and kidnapping of the journalist in September 2000. Furthermore, the perception that the Ukrainian authorities were the cause of Gongadze's murder and kidnapping, with the lack of reforms based on political concepts and economic, caused discontent of social and political selection in the post-Soviet era. People's dissatisfaction with their government and authorities gave rise to Viktor Yushchenko challenging economic and political reforms with the opportunity to organize a resistance movement capable of challenging the elite of social and political society. According to Kuzio, the Internet was the basis of the Orange Revolution because it engages participants in the revolution to be informed about developments during the protests. A series of events occurred during that time. These events were depicted with the help of focus groups, interviews and revolutions. The speeches of opposition leaders are also analysed. The events that took place from November 24 to December 3 were of great importance. Based on the protest negotiations and the stalemate that has occurredoccurred among the opposition, the current government forced opposition leader Yanukovych to paralyze the government with nationwide strikes in Ukraine. Likewise, opposition leader Yanukovych was reluctant to make any kind of concessions in favor of the government. Furthermore, the movement of security forces in the capital Kiev could have worsened the situation, but the warning of intelligence and military services throughout Ukraine prevented bloodshed. On December 3, the Supreme Court made the decision on the re-election of Viktor Yanukovych and Viktor Yushchenko. The court ordered the second round of the elections to be repeated within three weeks, but President Kuchma and Yanukovych preferred that the full elections be repeated. The international reaction of the President of the United States of America and the Russian Federation was observed, who agreed that fair and free elections should be held without interference from other international forces that could influence the results of the elections. Conceptual Framework and Theoretical Ideas The Orange Revolution was a one-of-a-kind event in Ukrainian history, however, the outcome followed an example of democratic breakthroughs or “electoral revolutions” already occurred in Georgia in 2003, Serbia in 200, Slovakia in 1998 and Kyrgyzstan in 2005, as some will argue. . All the cases I mentioned shared several characteristics: the catalyst for regime change was a corrupt national election; challengers to office holders sent extraconstitutional intentions to ensure that conventional principles of political play in the constitution were followed; the occupiers and challengers both claimed sovereign authority over a similar region; these progressive events ended without the massive use of violence by the state or the resistance; the end of these electoral uprisings triggered a critical leap in the level of democracy. Researchers have numerous theories of democratization. Seymour Martin Lipset's reflections on modernization as a driver of democratization nevertheless require serious consideration, while other structuralist studies have focused on related but particular factors, such as culture, economic imbalance, geology, and resource endowments. Combating these deterministic clarifications of democratization are actor-centered scholars who focus on the activities and communications of people and elites specifically as the driver of democratization or its demise. Transitologists part ways on two issues: whether cooperation between parts of the old system and democratic challengers is important for democracy-based change, and whether democratization should be seen as a game between elites, or whether social actors and mass should be included in the analysis. The Orange Revolution offers affirmative proof for individuals who emphasize conflict as a driver of democracy-based change and for individuals who assign a central role to organized mass activity in pushing for democratic rule change. According to this theory, democratization occurs not when the appropriation of power is generally equivalent and the two sides are forced to negotiate, but when social forces gain enough power to demand the introduction of democracy or protect it from autocratic violations. democratic power, including the solidarity of the resistance and the ability of the resistance to resist intimidation or to make autocracy costly, especially the ability of society to "coordinate its reactions to prevent violations of rights,.131-145