IndexIntroductionMedellin cocaine cartel leader killed by troops in ColombiaColombia drug lord Escobar dies in shootoutEscobar killed in MedellinDeath of the cocaine kingConclusionIntroductionPablo Escobar was considered one of the most wanted men in the world world by legal authorities who ran a cocaine cartel based in Medellin, Colombia. He died in a shootout in an ambush organized by the police and military. Escobar was at the helm of the drug trafficking network for more than a decade and managed to evade government authorities for a long time. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The purpose of this article is to compare and critically analyze the articles written about the incidents of the military-style operation that culminated in the victory (Escobar's death on the roof). Examples of articles analyzed include Medellin cocaine cartel leader killed by troops in Colombia, Colombian drug lord Escobar dies in shootout, Escobar killed in Medellin, and Death of the Cocaine King. This article analyzes how the articles were written, the type of vocabulary used, the point of view and the ideology. Finally, the article offers similarities and differences between the articles.Medellin cocaine cartel leader is killed by troops in ColombiaThis article is written to describe the events that took place during the intense military period, such as a shootout against the world's biggest drug lord, Pablo Escobar. . The article describes Escobar as one of the most successful cocaine traffickers, equally murderous, who met his inevitable death in a shootout in his own home. The type of vocabulary used in this article presupposes that of the military operation as investigators kept shouting “We won” to expose the long-standing activities of Escobar and his mercenaries in drug trafficking (Hawkinns, 2016, pp. 12- 13). .The writer's point of view is assumed to be multiple third person as several characters are mentioned in the article. The writer explains the activities undertaken by various actors in the operation to capture one of the world's greatest fugitives. The ideology expressed in this article is political in nature to describe the collaboration between various government agencies to fight the drug baron (Moustafa, 2016, pp. 1-2).Colombian drug lord Escobar dies in a shootoutThis article is written so as to describe the ideology important events that occurred during the operation to capture or kill Escobar. This article provides a vivid explanation of the events that unfolded during the shooting. Witnesses describe what they "saw" and heard during the 20-minute shootout, such as Escobar's "bullet-riddled body." The type of vocabulary used in this article includes that of the military operation that was intended to bring about an enemy end of the government. The writer uses the terminology 'triumph' to indicate the military mission in winning the battle against Escobar and drug trafficking. Likewise, the writer uses the terminology 'dismantle' to describe the entire shooting process which was intended to prevent Escobar from escaping just as if he had escaped from prison (Hawkinns, 2016, pp. 12-13). The writer's point of view presupposes that of a third person by gathering opinions and information from "unreliable" witnesses and security chiefs present at the scene. The writer also addresses the events that occurred before the final raid, such as Escobar's surrender, escape from aself-designed prison and the pressure inherent in the “People Persecuted by Pablo Escobar” (PEPES) rebellions. The ideology expressed in this article is assumed to be a war against drug trafficking orchestrated by the central government. The government's political ideology of cleansing the country of all forms of drug trafficking was clearly manifested in the raid against Escobar. ILThe writer highlights the inevitable fact that drug trafficking will skyrocket only after the demise of the drug kingpin. The government's failure to successfully manage Escobar involves bureaucracy, corruption, mass murder, and violence among its top officials (Moustafa, 2016, pp. 1-2). Escobar Killed in MedellinThis article is written in the form of reported passive voice speech to describe how Escobar was killed by disciplined forces in his own home. The article describes Escobar as the godfather of drug trafficking in the country. The writer prefers to paraphrase the events that occurred during the shooting and state the events by including the names of the police chiefs responsible for the operations. The type of vocabulary used in this article is descriptive in nature to illustrate the topic under concern. For example, the writer describes Escobar as a "God Father" who began his criminal career as a simple car thief. He also specialized in robbing gravestones and rose through the ranks to control the Medellin cartel that owns more than 80% of the drug business in the United States (Hawkinns, 2016, pp. 12-13). The writer's point of view is assumed to be multiple third person as there are multiple individuals mentioned along with their respective actions during and after the incident. There are several actors included in this article, led by the protagonist in the name of Escobar. The antagonists are led by presidents Cesar Gaviria and Bill Clinton along with security chiefs present on the scene such as Attorney General Gustavo de Greiff and law enforcement. Administrator Stephen Greene. The ideology expressed in this article is drug terrorism conceived by Escobar as a result of his being at the helm of the cartel. During his tenure, Escobar had committed numerous atrocities among Colombian citizens and politicians (Moustafa, 2016, pp. 1-2). Death of the Cocaine KingThis article is written in the form of a literature review describing events after analyzing available sources of information. The writer did not interview the witnesses or the police chiefs in charge of the operation to ascertain the relevant facts. The writer rewrites the events in a paraphrased manner which indicates a complete inadequacy in first-hand details. On the other hand, the writer uses direct quotes taken from other sources, such as tape recordings, to substantiate the facts of the operation. The type of vocabulary used in this article is legal in nature so as to describe the actions that occurred in the greatest national events sagas of all time. For example, extradition is used to describe government actions to send Escobar to the United States to face drug trafficking charges and other crimes. Military vocabulary is also used to describe the shootout between the officers and Escobar (Hawkinns, 2016, pp. 12-13). The writer's point of view takes that of the effects of the operation on the livelihoods of Colombians as well as on drug trafficking operations. The writer describes the intangible effect of his death on the flow of narcotics trafficking. This was because his role in the cartel had significantly shrunk to negligible size as members anticipated his eventual demise or recapture. Likewise, the locals breathed fresh air after the shooting because it had been.