From childhood, we start hearing murmurs about a heinous crime that has taken place and are associated with people wondering how a human being can commit such a crime horrible when suddenly, the death penalty becomes one of their demands and wishes. The death penalty for criminals and dissidents has been widely used in the history of humanity in cases of extreme crimes such as murder, treason, terrorism and espionage. The death penalty has been practiced in almost every single society: 58 nations apply it and 95 counties do not believe in it. Today the execution of criminals has been limited to some extent, but is still widely used. Capital punishment has become one of the great dilemmas in the world where people are divided whether it is ethical to apply such punishment or not. While some believe the death penalty is a fair judge, I believe it is unethical to end someone's life. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The first argument is that every person in this world has the right to live, even the person who committed the murder; Sentencing a person to death violates human rights. Capital punishment does not take into account the sacredness of human life. The human right to life is a primary right that governs all other existing rights. In its absence, all other fundamental rights have no reason to exist. Also: “Therefore choose life, that you and your descendants may live.” comes to approve the importance of human life. From this point the following question can be asked: who are we to choose between ending someone's life and depriving them of their primary right? The government should not give itself the right to kill human beings, especially when it kills with premeditation and ceremony, in the name of the law or in the name of its citizens, and when it does so in an arbitrary and discriminatory manner. This degrading, inhuman and cruel punishment is carried out in the name of justice; however, the purpose of justice is to protect liberty, property and life which are not respected when applying the death penalty. Second, the death penalty executed innocent people. If this continues, more and more innocent people will die. According to the Death Penalty Information Center (1993) since 1973, over 160 people have been released from death row with evidence of their innocence. From 2000 to 2011, there were typically 5 exemptions per year. The justice system is not always 100% fair. Sometimes juries convict the innocent. For example, Cameron Todd Willingham was convicted of malice murder. In 2004 he was executed and later discovered that the evidence had been misinterpreted. In many cases, corruption has reached the courts and judiciary where innocent people have been killed. Once the person is executed, nothing can be returned, the mistake is made and there is no going back. Furthermore, would we accept that some people suffer death for what is considered a non-crime in their home? The common citizen who was sent abroad for work or to study abroad could apply some of the actions considered normal in his hometown; however, these actions are considered illegal and eccentric and are associated with the death penalty as punishment. Thirdly, punishment is a brutal way of our justice system in which they punish those who commit crimes and that the harshness of the punishment is equivalent to the crime committed. But if we take a look, we see that we are committing the same crime again. Killing the criminal will not bring the victim back, this is what is called family closure. In.