The theory that a work of art could be true or false is a really interesting question, which is almost impossible to answer due to the different perspectives of the artist and the public of this work of art. There are also many different contexts and ways to look at this theory; could be seen as if the artwork were an original or a copy, or as if an artwork were true in its representation of what it is trying to create, or even as if the artwork art was truly art or not. I feel like art can be true or false, but it also can't be true or false. It is based solely on the perspective I take when looking at a work of art. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay When I look at ancient religious art I sometimes find myself wondering how true the depictions are to the actual event that is trying to be recreated. I not only wonder about the paintings, but also about the information provided about the artwork. One event that many different works of art are based on that I find particularly interesting is the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. There are many different representations of this event that have been created over the centuries and many of them have similarities that are often talked about. Over time this event has been painted or modeled many times, and one consistent factor among them tends to be two people or beings looking down from above. Most say it is simply the sun and moon, as they were often depicted in paintings with faces to represent the gods. But it is claimed that they are not just the sun and moon, but real people or beings who watch. One particularly interesting painting is found in a monastery in Kosovo from 1350, and depicts the two people keeping watch as if they were on a spaceship. This is something I find interesting as we will most likely never know what really happened at Jesus' crucifixion as the information is not available to us. This really holds true for most artworks of historical events because the artwork may be all there is to say about the event, so it is taken at face value, often without any real context or a true vision of the work of art. So the work of art could very well be true or false, there simply isn't the information needed to evaluate which it is. This ignorance allows the overall story to be told from any perspective you want and will remain true because there is no information. to oppose. Such ignorance has been shown countless times throughout history, one example being totalitarian leaders who convince their people that they are free and that everything is great. Dictators often erect statues and monuments to provide a sense of grandeur and positive achievement for the country or people. There is a monument in North Korea, the Mansu Hill Grand Monument, of former leaders Kim Il-Sung and Kim Jong-Il. This monument depicts the former leaders grand and cheerful, as they try to show how great their country and their leadership is. I find this to be fake art because it doesn't show the true devastation that is happening and has been happening for a long time in North Korea. Not only that, but it does not represent the slave labor used to create these great monuments. But the people of North Korea don't truly understand the world they live in because of the classified information they receive, so any art that shows a grand and happy state of North Korea is fake. Art can be a great way to manipulate and distort the truth into a favorable representation. Fortunately, in the Western world there is a much greater difference in opinions and.