In the 1960s, grapes were harvested and sold with pesticides. Agricultural workers would work and breathe toxins every day. Cesar Chavez wanted to raise public awareness about the grapes that farmers were harvesting. Even though the grapes contained pesticides, they were still sold in stores causing harm to shoppers. This article explores the original “Wrath Of Grapes” speech, the different thoughts on what people thought of Cesar Chavez's speeches and boycotts, and the impact they had on the community and people. The Grape Wrath revealed the real dangers of grapes that drove people to strike and continue to impact communities today. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Farm workers worked long hours every day and received low wages. Before Cesar Chavez founded his union, farm workers organized strikes to improve their working conditions. Farmers worked long hours and received little or no pay. In 1952, Chavez began his journey as a community organizer. This organization has fought for change for all farmers. Workers were not given clean water and had to work around pesticides. Strike after strike, their conditions do not improve because “The wine industry has refused to accommodate workers' demands for better wages and working conditions”. Because of this decision, Chavez wanted to spread his boycott nationwide. His goal was to convince people to stop buying grapes. The wine industry didn't want to listen to anything Chavez and his organization had to say. He wanted to spread knowledge not only of grapes but also of farmers' struggles. This boycott was everywhere. If grapes were not purchased, demand would decrease. The store would even lower the prices of grapes to get people to buy them again. Because of these low wages and working conditions, the Grape Wrath painted a picture of the hardships experienced by agricultural workers. In the year 1965, Cesar Chavez organized a strike against winemakers in San Joaquin Valley, California to protest unreasonably low grape wages. the reapers received their wages. Farmers were increasingly fed up with the ongoing injustice, so Cesar Chavez took a stand. However, in response to his peaceful protests, Chavez was unfortunately falsely accused of using "violence and terrorist tactics" by the president of the California Grape and Tree Fruit League, EL Barr, Jr in 1969. In a letter responding to EL Barr, Jr. , Cesar Chavez addressed this accusation and stated that he is fighting non-violently for the poor and dispossessed farmers who are simple human beings and who should have rights that allow them to be treated as such. In his letter, he stated: “They have been under fire, they have been kicked, beaten and driven by dogs, they have been cursed and ridiculed, they have been stripped, chained and imprisoned, they have been sprayed with poisons used in the vineyards but they were not taught; lie down and die, nor flee in shame, but resist with every ounce of human endurance and spirit.” In this statement, Chavez is demonstrating that although farmers may be mistreated and exploited, they will continue to remain strong and persevere against injustice. The “Grape Wrath” opened people's eyes to the truth about the damage grapes could cause. Chavez wrote this speech to touch millions of people about the largest boycott in history. He wanted to talk topeople as a family and a community. Farmers are closest to food production (Sumner). food, there would be no food, Chavez says that Environmental Protection Agency experts have informed the community that pesticides and several other poisons have been found in several food products that are the cause of cancer, disease and birth defects. They also informed our communities that pesticides are the cause of farmworker illnesses. Although the Environmental Protection Agency has warned the community that people continue to buy grapes that have caused disease. Some of these effects may be safe for a healthy male, but may not be safe for a child or pregnant woman. Three-year-old Amalia Larios was born with a spinal defect due to her mother's exposure to pesticides. Chavez was able to paint the picture of the effects and toxic substances present on grapes. Regardless of the facts, Chavez wants to touch people by saying, "What we absolutely know is that human lives are worth more than grapes and innocent-looking grapes on the earth." table in disguise, poisonous residue hidden deep down where the laundry can't reach.” The life of a human being is worth more than a couple of grapes. Chavez said this to let his community know that everyone's life is important, but that it can be taken away at any moment if the use of pesticides on grapes is not stopped. The “Wrath of Grapes” was a platform to help farmers express their demands. Chavez wrote this speech to be able to explain the dangers of selling grapes, but also to give voice to farmers' demands. The fruit that is eaten has all been harvested by farmers at some point. Picking fruit, especially grapes, breathing in toxic chemicals. Their water sources have already been polluted by pesticides. The demands the farmers wanted to express are: "A ban on the most dangerous pesticides used in grape production, a testing program for poisons sold in stores, a free and fair election for all farmers, and good faith bargaining ". The demands included improved working conditions, higher wages and the cessation of the sale of grapes in shops. If these demands are not met, the grape boycott will continue to reach several states. Chavez was calling for community commitment to help realize these demands. They all asked for where to eliminate the most dangerous pesticides, a testing program, fair elections and good faith bargaining. Farmers wouldn't take no for an answer. The “Wrath of Grapes” managed to spread the word across the nation to help achieve these demands. It's 1970 and the boycott is back again, but this time in the tech industry. Chavez and his people have been organizing for more than twenty-three years, but it's not over yet. Chavez's speech and unity was non-violent and opened the door for everyone to come and participate in the movement (Steven). The boycott returned with a goal of Chavez, to obtain equal rights for all agricultural workers. If Chavez promised a goal, then why does he continue to do so? Just because the boycott is over doesn't mean farmers shouldn't get what they deserve. Even though they “come from universities or grape and lettuce fields, staff members still work for room, board, clothing and $10 a week in pocket money, sleep in fans' homes or in their cars, and give their lives to La Cause". Chavez succeeded in obtaining equal rights for agricultural work. Nowadays, people who work in tech companies where workers are expected.