Index Charismatic LeadershipTransformational LeadershipKey SimilaritiesOriginsFocus:Benefit Sharing:Succession:CriticalThere is no single definition of leadership. Many people have different definitions and concepts of leadership that can be applied to different situations. Leadership involves a leader building a relationship with his followers and inspiring them to implement the outlined vision. Albert Murphy (1941) believed that leadership was a sociological rather than a psychological phenomenon. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay. Two leadership styles that this article seeks to examine are transformational and charismatic leadership. Transformational leadership and charismatic leadership styles may be similar, however they have key differences. The charismatic leader uses charm and attraction to create inspiration and loyalty in his followers. Some charismatic leaders are Malcolm X, John F Kennedy and Donald Trump. The transformational leader aims to change individuals and social systems through a unified vision. The transformational leader is able to excite, arouse and encourage followers to strive further to achieve the group's goals. They encourage their followers to be more innovative and creative. Abraham Lincoln was a transformational leader Charismatic leadershipSociologist Max Weber (1947) used the term to describe a form of influence based not on tradition or formal authority but rather on followers' perceptions that a leader is endowed with exceptional qualities. According to Robert House (1976), in In charismatic leadership theory, followers attribute heroic or extraordinary leadership skills when they observe certain behaviors. The general characteristics of charismatic leaders are: they have a vision, they are willing to take personal risks, they are sensitive to the needs of followers, they display extraordinary behaviors. These descriptions imply that charismatic leadership is based on a person's behavior, when observed by others, is termed charismatic leadership. Transformational leadership, on the other hand, is a concept that can be taught to people to make them more effective leaders using concepts that have been found to contribute to leadership relationships. Transformational Leadership Transformational leadership is defined as a leadership approach that brings about change in individuals and social systems. In its purest form, it creates valuable and positive changes among followers with the vision of transforming followers into leaders. The transformational leader believes that their followers are successful. They are able to excite, arouse and inspire followers to make extra effort to achieve the group's goals. Transformational leadership builds on transactional leadership: it produces levels of follower commitment and performance that go beyond what would occur with a transactional approach alone. Transformational leaders connect followers' future aspirations with the organizational vision and convince followers to achieve organizational goals to satisfy themselves. Transformational leaders seek to build a relationship by giving personal attention to their employees and demonstrating that they care and therefore improve social well-being. be employees. The purpose of transformational leadership is to give followers the opportunity to share their views and opinions on issues concerning the organization or on personal matters. This helps develop trust among followers and an environment where people can trust and respect their leaders. A guyenvironment also offers people the opportunity to explore different ways of doing and also promote creativity and innovation. Transformational leadership theories believe that people are motivated by the task at hand. The more structured the organization, the greater the success. People are therefore motivated to maximize their potential within the organization, which may be their primary need, while putting their individual interests second. Here, there is an emphasis on teamwork and collective action. Individuals exist in the context of community, rather than competing within an individualistic framework. Key Similarities Transformational leaders, like charismatic leaders similarly, inspire followers to transcend their own self-interests for the good of the organization, although researchers believe that transformational leadership is broader than charismatic leadership. They serve as role models and inspire followers. They challenge followers to take greater ownership of their work. Such leaders understand followers' strengths and weaknesses, so can align them with tasks that will leverage their optimal performance. Specifically, transformational leaders pay attention to the well-being of their individual followers. They engage with them and communicate with them on personal issues which convinces followers to feel positive and collaborate in the success of the organization. It is possible for personality sects to emerge from an organization where there is cooperation and the leader is admired. There are numerous examples, from Fidel Castro to Ronald Reagan, where excessive devotion to one person compromised critical conclusions about the quality of leadership. To build consensus, unfortunately, mediocrity can result. The same goes for the charismatic for his part, Robert House (1977) referred to charismatic leaders as those who have charismatic effects on their followers at an unusually high level. These followers perceive the leader's beliefs as correct. and accept it without question. They are affectionate towards. the leader and are emotionally invested in the mission of the group or organization. At the same time, a transformational approach may not be as effective as a more centralized and directive form of leadership. An extreme case of transformational leadership would be anarchy and if members of an organization have assertive personalities and intelligence, it may take a long time to arrive at decisions and carry out the required tasks. In extreme cases, indecision can lead to the downfall of the organization, especially if there are many individuals who are more predisposed to be followers rather than decision makers. Origins Charismatic Leadership: People believe that charismatic leaders are born and not made. The theory of charismatic leadership believes that leaders are born and cannot be created, that the leader has all the necessary qualities that make him a perfect leader, it also believes that charismatic leaders are the most successful ones and that these leaders have more followers than any other leader who adopts a different leadership style. Charismatic leaders have a phenomenal and natural charm that can attract people; Furthermore, this leadership style cares about people and their needs. Charismatic leadership creates a positive and democratic work culture where every follower can raise their voice to address their grievances. The central idea of ​​charismatic theory is that it puts people first; therefore, the charismatic leader has more followers than any other leader. A charismatic leader motivates followers who must make them feel the important aspect of the nation (Parolini, 2012). Transformational Leadership: Transformational leaders areadaptive leaders and most are trained to become leaders. A transformational leader is a leader who always shows people the particular vision, mission and motivates people regarding their path and mission. These leaders are eloquent and passionate speakers who motivate people by showing them their mission. People follow these leaders because these leaders have an indomitable passion and a genuine, intrinsic spirit. Transformational leaders do not ask people to follow them, but the intensity of positive passion and honesty of these leaders motivates people to join the leaders transformational; subsequently, the message of these leaders has a lasting impact on listeners. The transformational leader believes in empowering people, therefore empowerment is a key to success (Parolini, 2012). Focus: Charismatic Leadership: Charismatic leaders may not want to change anything in the organization whether good or bad. Charismatic leaders have a personal vision and mandate, where the expectation is that everyone else will follow suit while being sensitive to followers' needs. Transformational Leadership: Transformational leaders have a fundamental focus on transforming the organization and their followers. Transformational leadership is a relationship of mutual duplication and advancement that converts followers into leaders and can convert leaders into moral agents (Burns, 1978); The leader's influence process leaves space for the three followers to have the impact of the vision. The leader provides a learning environment and models for being a learner. Benefit Sharing: Charismatic Leadership: Charismatic leaders tend to work more for their personal benefit and image building. Transformational Leadership: Transformational leaders tend to work harder for the betterment of the organization and their followers. The charismatic leader is responsible for articulating the vision and gaining consensus and commitment to it. On the other hand. the transformational leader is open to U1e followers' input and impact on the vision and this promotes power sharing. Succession: Charismatic Leadership: Charismatic leaders are difficult to replace. Charismatic leadership theory is a leadership style in which followers attribute heroic or extraordinary leadership skills when they observe certain behaviors. Transformational Leadership: Transformational leaders will be replaced by the next commanding officer in the organization if they are properly trained. Transformational leaders inspire followers to transcend their self-interests for the good of the organization and are capable of having a profound and extraordinary effect on their followers. They pay attention to individual followers' concerns and needs, foster intelligence, provide vision and a sense of mission, communicate high expectations, and can change followers' awareness of issues by helping them look at old issues in new ways. Critics Both leadership styles have been criticized based on their negative effects. The downside of transformational leadership is the transformation itself. Sometimes the organization or people don't want to transform. At this point, the leader will become frustrated and may lose vision. Transformational leadership theories are stressed by the enormity and urgency of the tasks. A leader cannot wait for consensus-based decisions but must act, often immediately. If there are conflicts within the group, it is more difficult to achieve a census of what needs to be accomplished. There may be people who feel more capable of achieving an apparent goal and are impatient in waiting for others.