According to the Hofstede model, culture comprises six dimensions, which is considered a creative method in cultural research. However, it is crucial to critically analyze the Hofstede model. The model also has some limitations, such as small sample size, ignoring the rigidity of the definition of culture, simplification of cultural measurements as a bipolar phenomenon, and so on, which has introduced various critics for its famous dimensions. For the most part, Hofstede's concept of cultural measurement has been heavily criticized several times, all soon after its first publication. Although some dimensions of Hofstede, such as individualism versus collectivism, substantially support the findings of Parsons and Shils (1951) that a person reflects a culture in an organization in accordance with his or her personal and group choices. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayWhether a person behaves the same way at home, with friends or at work, can always create an argument. Hofstede, Goffman (1959) argues that it is unlikely that everyone wears a different mask, depending on the environment in which they find themselves. It portrays society as a drama in which everything is spectacle. People wear masks; They adapt to others and their environment. The theme is no longer stable, but "liquid". The behaviors adopted by a person in personal and family life are significantly different from those conducted in a work environment, so the final result of Hofstede's research cannot be consigned to culture. Trompenaars, Hampden-Turner (1997). On the one hand, considering the compliments, approval and reliability of his study by numerous researchers, one can consider these results as a new international influence. On the other hand, some aspects of his results have been harshly criticized, his research methodology could be an example. The ultimate definition of the culture he describes may lead to another disagreement. Moving on Fang (2003) even questioned Confucian dynamism which, in fact, constitutes the solid foundation of the fifth dimension. Many experiences portrayed, not necessarily dominant models in various corners within a society, must be the same. Therefore, numerous researches reveal that the practice of individualism and collectivism is more likely to adapt to that social culture. Do IBM employees share the same values ​​as everyone else? According to McSweeney, there is no reason to think that IBM's response reflects the "national average." First, because IBM is not a "typical" state enterprise, and second, employees are likely to separate themselves from the general population because "it is not very common to work for a high-tech enterprise in a third world country ". Hofstede simplifies his search not only to all types of workers available in a country, but to every individual who has the same nationality. It is not a relevant sample size to identify the power distance of an entire country. Sample sizes in some countries, although overall there is a large amount of data. For example, only six countries out of 40 countries had more than 1,000 respondents, and 15 countries had fewer than 200 respondents. The dimensions created by culture are always complex and intangible Clyde Kluckhohn (1962). However, seven conceptual dimensions differentiate the cultural dimension according to Fons Trompenaars (1993). The only score at the national level can be entrusted to the Trompenaars data, which represents the other half of individualism. Looking at the results,.