Topic > Discussion on the justifiability of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

The research I have carried out concerns four sources, two of which are online articles and the other two historical books on the Second World War. My research question is: “To what extent was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 by the United States necessary to end World War II, and if so, is it justifiable considering the death toll?” In the two to four months following the bombing, the acute effects of the atomic bombings killed 90,000-146,000 people in Hiroshima and 39,000-80,000 people in Nagasaki ' My guess is that it is actually justifiable, taking into account that 'Operation Downfall' would be much more expensive in terms of money, time and, above all, human lives. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay. My goal is to demonstrate that it is actually justifiable and the necessary way to end World War II. It is true that the bombings had and continue to have a great negative impact on the Japanese people. However, the death toll would have been much greater if "Operation Downfall" (the land invasion of Japan) had been carried out. To contextualize my question "To what extent was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 necessary for the United States to end World War II?" so is it justifiable given the number of victims?' World War II was about to end. The Allies (UK, USA and numerous other European countries) were winning and, on the other side, the Axis powers (Germany, Italy and Japan) were definitely losing. On December 7, 1941, Japan had begun advancing its fleet into the central and southwestern Pacific, involving United States territory. Japan intended to destroy the US Navy fleet by bombing Pearl Harbor. This did not disable the US Navy, but still led to a formal declaration of war between Japan and the United States of America. Germany officially surrendered to the Allies, ending the long and tedious war, and finally to the Europeans on May 7, 1945. Yet Japan was still in conflict with the United States. The United States needed to find a way to end the war as soon as possible. possible, with as few casualties as possible. The United States had a plan called "Operation Downfall" in which they would invade Japan with an extremely time-consuming land attack, and preliminary studies determined that 280,000 people would die in that invasion. So the Allies in July called on Japan to surrender immediately, otherwise the Allies would bring upon them "immediate and total destruction" if they refused. Japan ignored them. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay The United Kingdom and the United States have agreed to release the "Little Boy", an atomic bomb to destroy one of Japan's most industrial and military stronghold, Hiroshima. On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped a 15-kiloton bomb, which killed approximately 30 percent of Hiroshima's population. After the United States demanded Japan's surrender, warning that if it refused, further destruction would come. Japan did not respond. later, on August 9, 1946, the United States dropped another bomb on Nagasaki killing 70,000 people. After the two bombings on August 15, 1945, Japan surrendered unconditionally, ending World War II. This, therefore, constitutes.