Equity is a concept that must be emphasized in the formation of a successful country. Since equity can help ensure the protection of society's well-being and reduce disparities between society. This concept is also important for society, unless people in society admit that society, economy and country are fair enough, then it will become something that no longer matters. There is also analysis showing that injustice can influence economic performance and state administration. To get closer to equity, we need to understand what equity is. What is the concept of equity? Is equity effective for the country? Welch (2000) stated that equity is complicated due to its multiple meanings consisting of equality, fairness, and appropriateness. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayIs equality more or less equal or equivalent? It is defined as equal which means that society has the same rights, privileges, abilities or rank while equity is the concept of fairness that a fair share is proportional to what the person has earned and fairness as a principle of equity means ensuring that people have Enough. Based on the “Έgalité: What Is Fair” article I read, the equality policy applied in the Civil Rights Act of 1965 is introduced as “equal pay”. This policy used the concept of equal pay for equal work within the same company. However it is not a successful policy in that period, so he switches to the other version which is “equivalent”. The new policy concept provides for equal pay for work of equal value across different jobs. This shows that an equivalent concept applies ensuring the satisfaction of a person's needs and desires. As far as I'm concerned, the last concept which is “equivalent” is better rather than “equal pay” because the concept is fairer to people. They will receive the reward based on the work done. In order to improve the principle of equity, equality inputs and outputs are also introduced into society. Equality inputs mean everyone gets the same but can end up being unequal while equality outcomes mean everyone gets different but depends on needs but can end up being equal. In my opinion, to react to this concept I prefer equality outcomes because it depends on the person's needs and circumstances as well as providing the same input, but some people don't need the input at all. Besides that, the article also states that equality can be different when comparing three political points: vertical, horizontal and temporal. Although each is called equality, but the political implications can be very different. Vertical equality means comparing whether someone is higher or lower, better or worse than anyone else, it means comparing all people. Horizontal equality compares people within subgroups who have the same circumstances or needs. Temporal equality involves comparing the same person or groups at different times. Furthermore, the concept of fairness is also mentioned in this article. Equity is the concept of fairness that a fair share is proportional to what the person has earned. This concept is mainly measured by the economic market value of production. For example, do something based on how much you paid. . But as far as I'm concerned, this concept is not feasible in a diverse society. This concept failed to measure people's actual job performance. Because everyone.