In philosophical terms, prostitution is defined as a means by which a person amplifies his financial consumption or, in additional terms, "benefits" by exchanging something that he easily has available, in this case, their bodies. It is often commonly agreed that prostitution is immoral, however, this topic is one of the least debated moral situations. Limited fundamental philosophical treatments of the issue have been mentioned. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Of these, in particular, Lars Ericsson's "Defence of Prostitution" reinforces the substantive principles of individuality, equal opportunity and the unlimited market for sexual rights. life. The real dilemma with prostitution, Ericsson says, is the insincerity, prejudice and disciplinary perspectives that surround it. Ericsson justifies that if we eliminate these relationships from prostitution, with some modifications, ethically appropriate, or “healthy,” prostitution can eventually exist. On the other hand, according to the British philosopher Carole Pateman, the main feminist debate declares that prostitution continues to exist. be ethically unfavorable, regardless of the changes made, as it is one of the most explicit examples of male domination over women. In this case, prostitution represents a predominantly frightening example of patriarchy. Since patriarchy is cruel, prostitution is equally cruel. One can agree with Pateman's statement and it is precisely this position that will be discussed in this article. Lars Ericsson argues that if we adopt the principles of individuality, equal opportunity and unrestricted markets, then prostitution should be seen like any other exchange of goods or services in an open society. Overcoming such preconceptions would allow the birth of morally adequate or "healthy" prostitution. This is incorrect as Lars has not come close to visualizing "morally sound prostitution", and his attempt shows a willful ignorance or inattention to the patriarchal aspect of our humanity. Erricson also states that prostitutes don't sell themselves, they sell their sexual services. . He defends this by saying that any person whose job it is to sell a certain service is not condensed into a commodity, and therefore prostitutes are not condensed into a commodity. Pateman does not consider prostitution to be simply the sale of sexual services, as Ericsson claims. «Services and workforce are inseparably connected to the body and the body is, in turn, inseparably connected to the sense of self. Neither the workforce nor the services can actually be separated from those who offer them for sale." "Ericsson, charges against prostitution". Ericsson refutes the feminist accusation of prostitution, which is focused solely on the objectification of women and the domination of men over women in the industry. Furthermore, there are very few male prostitutes in the industry, as ninety-nine percent of all prostitutes are women, and furthermore the number of female clients is almost insignificant. Therefore, the feminist accusation also focuses on the fact that prostitutes promote discrimination between the sexes, as they allow women to be purchased by anyone who can afford them. Ericsson tests this theory by linking the sale of sex to the sale of other services. For example, we do not represent a masseuse who offers us the service of a massage, so why not consider a prostitute as a masseuse? One reason to deny Ericcson's argument above is that prostitutes are not simply selling a sexual service,.