The impermanence of everyday life is complex. It continually asserts itself in this linear movement of life with a variety of constants and variables. What is "everyday"? Why is it important to understand this? The term can be linked to other terms such as "routine" or "home". A space that provides a kind of grounding and is a system in its own right. The word groundedness can be misleading, although the “everyday” serves as the grid for our lives, it exists in a constant state of flux. He moves, balances, jumps, runs and sleeps. And all this happens and repeats itself. It leaves traces of its previous occurrences, sometimes we are condemned to it or otherwise evolve from it. But it can be said that it is largely under the control of the repetition factor. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThese anniversaries are a way of understanding ourselves as individuals. A child responds to his name after it is repeated over and over until he finally identifies himself in response to the name. So it can be a way to make sense of the world to come to a level of coherence and derive an understanding of oneself and the world. Rita Felski, in 'The Invention of Everyday Life' states that repetition is essentially seen as a force against progression. As we move forward, this regularity embodies a sense of reassurance. We are in a sense equipped with a set of tools that help us move forward. There is no need to teach us, for example, "eating", we are condemned to a certain story that we repeat. You or I never invented this activity, other cyclical forces in nature drive it. But every time we do an activity we reinvent it. Duality Everyday life coexists with the other specialized category of life. Without which it would cease to exist. The system of everyday life exists with its double side, which brings the banal everyday life to life. Understanding the mundane is subjective to the nature of its existence. Besides immediate ideas like bathing or eating, it also exists in other worlds, and these worlds differ from each individual to another. In the age of modern technology; smartphones and social media play an important role in understanding the stratifications of meaning that the "everyday" generates, concerning individual but also mass experience. The everyday exists within a broader framework accompanied by its dual world of production and capitalism. Michel de Certeau talks about the colonization of everyday life by the commodity form. Production would not exist without consumption and vice versa each provides the other with the very essence that would define them. Man needs the essentials to prepare food, but this can only be procured if it has been produced. Preparing food is part of his daily activity and making the essentials available is perhaps part of the other's daily life. So it builds a system that coexists. It is common ground shared by everyone in society. It is one of the foundations that produces and reproduces it to support and fuel mutual growth. According to Henri Lefebvre, everyday life was where he saw capitalism surviving and reproducing. Members of everyday society and therefore of capitalist society reproduce the activities of their routine by eliminating the material conditions from which the activity initially germinated. They themselves are responsible for this condition and fail to understand its roots. These activities maintain a veil that prevents people from seeing that their own activities are responsible for this vicious cycle created in their daily lives. The Everyday Every systemday is the larger system that has functions that connect the dots and unite the systems within it. There are subsystems created within the larger system and depend on each other for their functionality and growth. They may appear to be distant but connected to everyday life. Because the everyday and the "specialized category" feed into each other, the system as a whole has an interdependent quality. For example, as mentioned in the text Everyday and Everydayness by Henri Lefebvre and Cristina Levich, Industrially produced food works around specific household appliances such as the refrigerator or oven. Once the dominant forces that make the combination of these elements possible with each other are understood, the mechanism is recognized and is unable to function without the support of the other. That's when the system collapses. As a larger domain system, what would happen if the global web collapsed? Subsystems that depend on this network medium automatically become dysfunctional. Even though these functions may seem distant, they constitute a system of close links that allow it to function as a whole. It is therefore the most universal condition, the most unique, the most social, the most individualized, the most evident and the best hidden. In addition to the functional ones, it has non-functional aspects. This can probably be added to the “best hidden” category. I see the same greengrocer every day when I leave the house every morning, but one day I didn't see him. This eliminated some consistent patterns in my mind. We all have these moments where we catch ourselves thinking, “Why?” It does not interrupt any noticeable functions during the day. I was still able to leave the house and continue my day as I always had. This image that is created in my mind probably has a subconscious function that may not seem practical in the everyday world. But I fed on it daily at a lesser level. This disruption, however subtle, ultimately added up to this unknown sum. There are points of stagnation and flow in everyday life. There is an inconsistency in how this is done. But it appears again and again, and this assures you of the event/activity/sensation. Modernity and everyday life constitute a deep structure that was built some time ago. New stories, trends, fashions have become part of everyday nonsense. They all aim for "change", how you can "change your life", they want everything, and quickly and instantly. In the modern age we have access to everything that is at our fingertips that allows us to travel far and fast. And this instant delivery makes us want more and more to become mere passive consumers, neglecting value, meaning and the various factors that make us who we are. We are condemned to a certain story that we repeat, at any moment of the day. The repetition factor has possessed us permanently. But this type of possession is what makes us free since no one can demand anything. The postmodernist notion of "original" rejects the modern idea that it is new and replaces it with the idea that it is the fusion of elements of the past and previously existing cultures. This emerges from a terrain of repetition and recurrence. This ground is the grid. Rosalind Krauss underlines that the “grid” is paradoxically being rediscovered. He says that a prison in which the artist feels liberated is a further paradox. So it already exists in other forms or cultures and no one can claim to have invented it. And now, if we look at the works of artists like Agnes Martin or Mondrian, we could say that the works practically cease to develop and become involved in repetition. "The Islands", by Agnes Martin (fig. 1) are a group of twelve identical large peopleSquare paintings are a body of works that provide an insight into the visual modes in his work. The opaque white color and the horizontal lines drawn in pencil remain constant in all the canvases. The work is reproduced within it, focusing an idea on the grid. In her opinion these works are not ideal for reproduction as they are light and bright and therefore deal with fusion and the formless. They are a product of themselves but also do not exist as individual units. They are whole bodies that in a certain sense try to examine the relationship between each other. They do not exist one after the other, the body of work is a system and the individual canvases are functions within the larger system that creates the whole. The image of everyday life and the digital age In today's world, everyday life is constantly documented on our smartphones. The images that develop distort our understanding of what we see, or rather disconnect us from reality. What is real and how it can be changed initially creates a gap. Then as we proceed, the 'transformed' object slowly takes over our perception of our understanding of everyday life, thanks to the constant production of these images. This creates a culture to which we are condemned. Through social networking platforms we access other people's images which flow into ours and vice versa. Images become obsolete, as new ones are produced every day. Advertising or other media such as Instagram; they have become an extension of us. Marshall McLuhan talks about this extension. He says it is almost impossible to answer questions about human extensions without considering them all together. Any extension, whether of the skin, hand or foot, affects the entire psyche and social complex. “ In the electric age, when our central nervous system extends technologically to evolve us into all of humanity and to incorporate all of humanity into us. We participate in the depth of our every action. It is no longer possible to assume the dissociated role of the literate consumer. ”The logic behind the 'filters' or 'effects' provided by the applications on our smartphones is a way of grouping the masses into categories rather than the image itself. These repeatedly produced images become an extension of us and eventually extend into a broader category that blurs the lines between distinct personalities or identities. they appear as after applying the filters. This is why plastic surgeons are seeing an increasing number of visits from young people. According to the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconceptive Surgery, at least 55 percent of plastic surgeons in the United States have noticed an increase in the number of patients trying to "look better in selfies." ”(Fig. 2) Altering/reconstructing the body to repeat what happens in society means taking a big step forward in escaping from oneself and being part of an unconscious cult that represents popular culture. Making Meaning in Everyday LifeThe sound of everyday life automatically imposes monotony. The very act of associating the “everyday” with “monotony” points to the fact that human beings are programmed to attribute meaning to all experiences. This association/meaning-making is layered within the physical, emotional, and social factors that influence being. We consider each word we use differently in how our past experiences guide us. Every word we use builds a different image/feeling towards the subject. This is embedded in the larger system of everyday life. The effect of attributing meaning is formed by each individual subconscious and therefore becomes instinctive. It also allows the object to.