Is it ethical to kill living creatures for the common good? Is the sense of necessity greater than morality? Does morality apply when the needs of ordinary people respect the rules of ethics? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay In the 1800s, it was discovered that whale oil could light cities in ways never before achieved. So, from that point on, whale oil suddenly became a global demand, whaling. However, there will always be one issue that would question the existence of such a thing, the ethicality of whaling. Is it ethical to kill hundreds of creatures just to plunder their oil and light their homes? Whaling has become a global activity that has given humans many benefits from killing hundreds of whales that have provided them with oil and large pieces of whale meat. It is important to thus maintain the traditional relationships between humans and animals; this statement proves that whaling is unethical. Killing innocent creatures just to satisfy human needs is ethically unacceptable. On the contrary, due to global demand, cultural beliefs and traditions, whaling seemed to become ethical. Furthermore, the morality of whaling also connects the traditional bond between humans and whales, according to which whaling should not be banned but should be allowed if its use is decidedly “sustainable”. An example of this is the return of commercial whaling in Japan, as it has demonstrated that it is an annual and sustainable tradition to hunt whaling in the Faroe Islands. Another example of a pro-whaling island is Nantucket Island, considered the whaling capital of the United States. In line with the island is the legend of the tragic Essex disaster on Nantucket which highlighted the possibilities of whaling activities, whether ethical or not. Therefore, the disaster sent the victims wandering into the heart of the sea. The film was directed by Owen Chase, the Essex's first mate, and George Pollard, Jr., the captain. Under Pollard's captaincy, the crew of the Essex Nantucket suffered a devastating disaster that led to the deaths of some of the crew. The question now is: Would Chase have captained the whaler Essex better than Pollard? Would disaster still happen if Chase had been captain of the ship all along? I think he would lead the crew better since he is familiar to most of the members and has proven his seafaring prowess since bagging barrels of whale oils from his past expeditions. He was even promised to become captain of a whaling ship until the industry decided to give the title of captain to George Pollard, son of a prominent person in the whaling industry. Throughout the film, Chase is shown to be better at sea than Captain Pollard. It can be seen from the very beginning of their expedition, when the ship's best knights were stranded, he riskily climbed the poles and freed the knights. Chase was also a man to his crew. He joins them and communicates with them directly and audibly. That is why the Essex crew depended more on him than on Captain Pollard. Furthermore, Captain Pollard made very undesirable and inappropriate verdicts, such as heading into a fast and violent storm. Pollard never listened to anyone on the ship, especially Chase, and made bad decisions. Therefore, given Chase's seamanship and experience in whaling, I think that he, Owen Chase, should have commanded the ship Essex. When the shipEssex was destroyed by that monstrous white whale, the crew sailing from their whaleboats until they reached the beach. an uninhibited island, Henderson Island. There they found something to eat such as fish, eggs and birds. The trauma left by the Essex disaster has hunted most of them. They may live on Henderson Island, however, food supplies for the entire crew are in short supply. In contrast, Henderson Island exhibits resources that cannot be seen in the middle of the sea. However, I would still sail as it was my promised responsibility. We came to the island together; we'll even leave it together. One of the most annoying characters in the movie In the Heart of the Sea was Captain George Pollard's cousin, Henry Coffin. His character in the film began when he questioned Chase's decision to send soldiers on a whale hunt even though they were not yet east of Halifax, where whales are mostly seen. His character was becoming very unfair after the sinking of the Essex Nantucket when he questioned Owen's act of giving water to Matthew Joy who was injured due to the storm they went through. He even wondered why they would give water to someone who almost died. After the whaling boats separated and all the rations in Captain Pollard's boat were all used up, they came to the decision to sacrifice one member so that the others would survive. Captain Pollard was the unlucky one and that's when Henry Coffin's character changed. Instead of killing his captain, his cousin, he committed suicide so he could save his cousin's life. Perhaps he will come to the realization of his past actions, his arrogance and selfishness where, for the last time, he can at least save his captain, his dear cousin, from death. After Homecoming, the industry wanted the Essex survivors to lie about what happened in the Essex tragedy. However, Chase refused to embroider the truth and thereby influenced Pollard to tell the truth about what really happened. Captain Pollard did not listen to what his father advised him to hide the truth. George Pollard stated what really happened that caused riots on Nantucket. However, his statements were not enough for everyone to believe him. That's why she organized another trip for him to show the world the truth and to honor his past comrades by exposing the tragedy that the brave men of Essex had faced. Unfortunately, he failed and never again witnessed the sperm whale he wished to find. “Pollard went out again in search of the white whale. He never found it. It ran a second ship aground off Hawaii. Twice cursed. I never sailed again.” Nickerson said. Thomas Nickerson, a survivor and the youngest Essex Nantucket, told his account of the Essex tragedy through the writer Herman Melville. First, he refused to share his account of Essex's mysterious history. He didn't even tell his wife what really happened. However, it seems that the Essex tragedy weighs on him so much that it pushes him to tell everything he remembered to the writer Melville and to write his own story of the events that happened towards the end of his life. This disaster seemed to be undoubtedly the most constructive and formative experience of his life. There are many confusions as there are errors and contradictions between the book and the film. There are several survivors who have given different accounts of the stories. There is Owen Chase's account of the tragedy, Nickerson's account based on the writings of Herman Melville, and the accounts perhaps made by the other five Essex survivors. However, it was Chase's and Nickerson's accounts that were used extensively.