This is the first draft of my research paper on how sexual harassment is perceived and how certain different perceptions affect victims of sexual harassment. Finding digital sources was quite easy compared to finding print sources as there was much more relevant and current information I could find online rather than on a shelf. I hope that the question I attempted to answer and the topic were not too broad or narrow, and that the conclusions drawn from my research were adequate for a first draft of this article. My biggest goal for this article is to write enough that I can hit the minimum page limit without being redundant and write a satisfying conclusion. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay In the 20th and 21st centuries, sexual harassment is becoming an issue that is attracting attention in both workplaces and educational institutions. However, there are different perceptions about what legitimately constitutes sexual harassment and how such different views affect victims of sexual harassment in unique ways. While a single definition of sexual harassment is still lacking due to varying legal, workplace, and even cultural perceptions of what constitutes sexual harassment, a commonly accepted definition of sexual harassment describes it as “unwelcome and unwelcome sexual behavior in a workplace or educational context that affects a person's physical and psychological well-being" (Mamaru 29). But this definition causes some victims of sexual harassment to be dismissed because their experiences may not have been as physically or psychologically traumatizing and therefore such instances do not truly constitute sexual harassment. Due to the lack of a single and clear definition, due to a series of different perceptions, the experiences of victims of sexual harassment are often invalidated, unheard or rejected even by the victims themselves. First, there is a lack of clear and clear definition. Consistent and meaningful definition of sexual harassment in court decisions that allows a victim to express their concerns when faced with harassment in an employment or educational institution. In What's a Reasonable Woman to Do? The Judicial Rhetoric of Sexual Harassment, written by Professor Frances J. Ranney of Wayne State University, examines two specific concepts of hostile environment claims in sexual harassment law, the “reasonable woman” standard of review and the legal category of “sexual harassment” please." “ Within this text I could not find a coherent statement about what sexual harassment was, but rather the outcome of the case was determined by the unique facts of the sexual harassment case. While this may seem reasonable, it is evident that courts have ruled unfavorably against the victim due to an unclear and far too narrow definition of sexual harassment. One such “welcome harassment” case occurred in 1994, Carr v. Allison Gas Turbine Division, where. the sexual harassment claim at the lower court level was lost by Mary Carr, who was the first and only tinsmith in the workplace who eventually resigned after five years in the tin shop claimed to have been frequently reported to her co-workers with “obscene epithets ∴ displayed sexually explicit signs and posters throughout the work area and sabotaged her equipment, and one exposed himself to her on two occasions” (Ranney 2). Despite this, Carr's complaints were ignored by his supervisors and his request 231).