The speech is an indispensable part for presidential candidates to win the votes of citizens. How an individual verbalizes and expresses his or her thoughts and ideas can be a critical element for voters to decide whether the presidential candidate is competent enough to lead an entire country. Words have impact because they can substantially influence people, especially when used on a big stage. Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump faced off for their second televised debate in 2016. However, in their second televised debate, logical fallacies emerged in Donald Trump's debate against Hilary Clinton. The logical fallacy that two wrongs don't make a right is present in the statements made by Donald Trump regarding his comments: “I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything” (Forbes). The public labeled his remarks as implying sexual violence against women. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay When asked about his debate comments, Donald Trump responded by saying, “That was locker room speech. I'm not proud of it. I'm a person who has great respect for people, for my family, for the people of this country… But it's something that happened. Look at Bill Clinton, [what he did was] much worse 'there has never been anyone in the history of politics in this nation who has been so offensive to women... Bill Clinton abused women' (New York Times). Donald Trump attacks the wife of his challenger, Bill Clinton, mentioning his history with women, particularly the scandal involving "President Bill Clinton, 49, and 22-year-old White House intern Monica Lewinsky" (New York Daily News). what he has done about how he treats women, Donald Trump claims that if Bill Clinton did something similar or worse, his actions compared to Clinton's wouldn't be as terrible in retrospect. comparison with another individual or circumstance does not automatically classify it since the two wrongs constitute a right logical fallacy, a comparison only makes sense if and only if the action can be rationalized and justified without depending on a comparison to strengthen the argument in question. However, with Donald Trump's statements made during the presidential debate, he is using former President Bill Clinton's past transgressions to defend, and almost excuse, his behavior. In essence, Trump insists that he should be absolved of the inappropriate conduct in which he was involved. Furthermore, his actions seem to somewhat mirror Bill Clinton's actions towards Monica Lewinsky. The two errors do not constitute a correct error, which lies in the fact that the previous behaviors of an individual or group of individuals do not alter how justifiable or unjustifiable the actions of another individual are. Ultimately, what validates a person's conduct lies in the ethics behind their actions. If someone participates in an activity classified as immoral or reckless, it is still not justified, even if someone has done the same thing in the past. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now All in all, the company should be able to recognize logical fallacies to differentiate.