Violence against women has long existed in memorials that play the main role of showing male dominance in society. It has reduced over the years, but still continues in many homes behind closed doors. This violence is now associated with negative social, medical, physical and psychological problems that manifest themselves in women of reproductive age and pose a serious threat to women's health in particular. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay We can also better define violence against women as gender-based violence and could further cause morbidity and mortality among the affected women. Depending on the type and extent of violence, affected women may experience health, mental or physical and emotional problems which may in turn push them into substance use and alcohol abuse or even suicidal tendencies, further worsening their health. With the current understanding of sexual violence as a display of ferocity, scholars also came to view sexual violence as a sign and means of ensuring female subjugation. «Sexual violence is a consequence of male-dominated customs that have been in place for a long time. This male strength is reinforced by prostitution and erotic entertainment, in which women are degraded and treated in submissive ways. For a long time, sexual violence has been found among men due to the social imbalance among people. Likewise, sexual violence should be seen as applied within legitimate and social structures in which women were seen as the property of men. In truth, the tort of assault was a pecuniary tort since it was against the man who owned it and not against the victim of the assault. As a result, the sexual mistreatment of a woman was more of a violation of a man's property than of the woman's integrity, thus ensuring that rape laws were implemented as methods of securing a man's or family's property. As a pecuniary tort, the penalty for assault was often the payment of a total sum to the woman's father or brother, as is also the case in some countries today where groups of injured people might simply seek compensation from the attacker. Legal and social structures in which women are generally seen as the property of their spouses further reinforce the presumption that men qualify for sexual access to their wives and thus increase the inability to see marital violence as a crime . Sexual violence is not only an example of cultural policies that allow the abuse of women because they are not esteemed, but in itself serves to reinforce the subjugation of women and ensure their compliance with today's sexual orientation norms . Sex work and cultural desires expect women to be "virgin" and "pure." Women who do not fit in – for example, people who dress seductively – are believed to have incited sexual violence, which in turn warrants the implementation of these sexual orientation standards. Short-lived ferocity against a woman may seem to stem from her individual mental problems, sexual disappointment, horrendous burdens of life, or some natural desire towards hostility. Despite the fact that each of these “reasons” has been used to clarify and even legitimize male ferocity, they distort an unpredictable reality: men have been taught to identify with the world regarding strength and control, and have been encouraged to such wickedness. it's a techniqueadequate for maintaining control, resolving conflicts and communicating indignation. When a manager explicitly annoys a representative, he applies his ability to limit his job opportunities and improve his position. When an abusive spouse uses beatings to keep his or her significant other at home and to prevent her from seeing loved ones or seeking outside employment, he is exercising dominance and control. When men assault women, they bring forth the desire to overwhelm or repel. Even if a single man offering a display of ferocity sees it as a surge of intensity, that's not the point. The way in which such a large number of individual men feel qualified to express their dissatisfaction or indignation by behaving viciously towards such a large number of individual women shows how deeply these exercises of strength and brutality have been depicted. Incalculable daily demonstrations of wickedness create an atmosphere of fear and weakness that limits women's opportunities for activity and controls much of the development of our lives. The risk of male brutality continues to protect women from venturing behind the conventional jobs for which they have acquired an education to keep them “in their place.” An individual living free from their former abuser can clearly perceive how their life changed when they were beaten. There might be a case where the abuser might disconnect them from relevant peers, convince them to stop working, monitor the victim's movements to make sure they don't go anywhere, and very serious and constant beatings, leaving the victim with no one to turn to and I feel totally alone. On the surface, it seems that men profit from sexism, this arrangement of male force, control and brutality. On a deeper level, we realize that sexism hurts men just as it hurts women. Sexism, and even more explicitly malevolence against women, hurts men because it hurts the women and young women in their lives and because it prevents them from having positive, adoring connections with women. In recent times, some men have begun to perceive and recognize the ways in which dealing roughly with women (and other men) hurts them. The meetings were used in an attempt to raise awareness among men and show them how to be partners with women in the drive to end brutality against women. The best way to learn the origins of brutality and its possible solutions is to understand the connection between populism, strength and welcoming brutality complicit in the setting of couple elements. Specifically, strength and misogynistic moods can be assumed to have both personal and complicit consequences for relational hostility. Private complicit wickedness is a critical social problem worldwide and is regularly identified. Meanness can be exhibited in physical structures, for example, hitting, kicking, and gagging, and in passionate structures, for example, boisterous attack, force, control, disconnection, mockery, use of personal information for humiliation. However, paying little attention to structure, personal partner ferocity has real results. Scientists focused on the prevalence of personal partner meanness among married couples, couples living together, and dating couples. Rates of nastiness among unmarried straight couples are quite high, suggesting that violence is about the same level for both married and unmarried individuals. The extent of private accomplices' meanness, including physical hostility and verbal animosity, is high on average among couples attending school. Some reports.