This sex work topic fits into broader gender and public policy perspectives as it aims to address the impact of Canadian prostitution laws on those involved in sex work sex industry. The Supreme Court of Canada case, Bedford v Canada, is a ruling related to sex work in Canada. The plaintiffs, Terri-Jean Bedford, Amy Lebovitch and Valerie Scott, argued that Canada's prostitution laws were depriving sex workers of their right to safety by giving them no choice but to work secretly. The 3 main bans in the Bedford case related to the running of obscene communes, which force sex workers to engage in price negotiation in private areas, which are typically unsafe spaces where prostitutes can be victimized. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay. Making a living off the benefits of prostitution is also illegal, which prohibits prostitutes from creating a safe workplace, such as hiring bodyguards or taking security measures. The third major prohibition concerns communication for the purpose of prostitution in public. This creates a barrier to starting a family and having children. These laws ultimately force sex workers into unsafe situations and could have led to further victimization as crimes against sex workers would go unreported due to fears of double criminalization. Former Justice Minister Peter McKay introduced Bill C-36 on December 6, 2014. Prior to that date, the sex industry was regulated by the Criminal Code of Canada. The rationale for this bill is to protect sex workers and people who purchase sex by criminalizing the purchase of sex, obtaining material benefits from sex work, advertising sexual services, and communicating the purpose of sex work. This goal makes prostitution illegal. Sex work, particularly prostitution policy, is becoming a critical issue in Canada as it explores organized crime, health safety, human trafficking, abuse and human rights violations. This issue needs to be addressed by politicians and representatives at national and international levels in order to create equal laws to ensure the safety of sex workers. Despite concerns about the health and safety of sex workers, women in Canada lack adequate legal provisions to work due to the criminalization of sex work under Bill C-36 which disadvantages and marginalizes sex workers With a punitive attitude towards prostitutes, prostitution jurisprudence creates victims of abuse and dangerous conditions, and the stigma surrounding sex work diminishes the legitimacy of the career. Canada v Bedford is a Supreme Court of Canada ruling regarding Canadian laws relating to sex work. Former Justice Minister Peter McKay introduced Bill C-36 in 2014, which criminalizes aspects of sex work such as purchasing bodyguards, working in public spaces and communicating for the purpose of prostitution in public. Without the decriminalization of prostitution, there will be no government funding to ensure financial support for these women, there will be no regulation of brothels and mental health support. Prostitution jurisprudence creates dangerous working conditions in which sex workers are forced to work illegally. Work.