Online falsehoods have spread rapidly in Singapore media since the creation of the Internet. It is a negative voice, thought, comment, or attack directed by someone at a person or organization. Is proven false, which may cause a significant impact, for example undermining racial and religious harmony or national security. The Singapore government has enacted several relevant laws, such as the Sedition Act, the Internal Security Act (ISA), the Telecommunications Act, the Defamation Act and the Criminal Code to prevent cases of online falsehoods. Given the many existing laws imposed on online falsehood, the government should not enact additional laws to prevent and combat falsehood. As it will prevent people from expressing their opinions, which will create more unhappiness among them as their voices will be unheard. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay According to Channel News Asia's Bharati Jagdish (2018) discussion on online falsehoods, he believes that online users can use information provided by others as a discussion platform, to elevate their understanding of the situation to become a thinking society . The opinions given online by people help create a platform for discussion, whereby people can read to understand how others feel about a situation that is happening. This interaction allows people to freely express their opinions, as long as it is not targeted at anyone or an organization and does not affect racial and religious harmony or national security. With these existing laws, the government can prosecute violators who cause a stir online. A good example of how these laws are enforced can be seen in a recent online falsehood by The Real Singapore (TRS). Both the founder and co-founder of TRS were charged with sedition and jailed because they spread the news about a Filipino family complaining about Singaporeans playing loud music during the Thaipusam religious festival to generate revenue. In this case, TRS news can influence social trust and peace between foreigners and Singaporeans. Will implementing more laws on online falsehoods put journalists' jobs at risk? An economic factor to reflect on. According to the Editor-in-Chief of Singapore Press Holdings (SPH), Warren Fernandez, (2018), said that the laws imposed should have clear but subtle differences between the deliberate and inadvertent spread of falsehoods. With the implementation of more laws than exist, the journalist's job is becoming difficult. Because people don't want to offer any information because they might be afraid of being accused of unintentional crimes. Eventually, journalists' work becomes harder and many will not want to do it as a job due to the limitations. However, adopting additional laws to prevent and combat online falsehoods may be necessary to help push the boundaries of existing laws. According to Edwin Tong, MP for Marine Parade GRC (2018), said that topics relating to falsehoods are not covered in depth when dealing with offenders. When a fresh piece of news attracts the attention of others, the main point of the lie is left hanging. So, the new approach to this situation would be to de-escalate the fake situation before returning to the next issue. An example will be the story of "Rebeca Riviera", she wrote on Facebook claiming that Irma authorities were hiding the truth about Air France having increased”.