As we discussed above the cases of Indian journalists where they had died, in some cases the assailants shot them in front of their houses and some others died when their throats were slit, but in in each case it was clear why they were killed, although in the case of Gauri Lankesh the judgment is still pending, but in four other cases they died because of their profession, when a journalist made a story against someone, the opposition party killed him, it means they were doing something wrong and when journalists tried to unleash them then they killed them. As I said in my introduction, today the general public is more influenced by right-wing groups or sometimes left-wing groups and when a journalist says something about this or writes something about that, people start criticizing him and eventually he has to give the life. This is why people are starting to think that if someone says something or writes something then they should check facts and figures before criticizing any journalist. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay As journalism is said to be the golden career and in India it is called the fourth pillar of democracy, then why not. of dead journalists increases every year. Because we are not that tolerant. Sometimes political parties also use journalists for their work and after completing their work they let them kill them, sometimes when elections are approaching or it is visible that all media is behind them then they give financial support to the family of the dead journalists. Furthermore, they only support them with those with whom they know they could get votes in the future. The same happened in the case of Gauri Lankesh, when she had died, the Tripura CM of the communist party intervened in protest and demanded immediate action because Gauri Lankesh had some kind of leftist ideology, it is said. But the prime minister did not even visit Shantanu Bhaumik's house when he was killed in Tripura state, so somewhere there is a visible difference in politicians advocating a death for their own use. Although in Uttar Pradesh and Jharkhand the prime minister gives financial support to the family of journalists after death but the main thing is that the government is not making any law for the safety of journalists. Even news channels and media outlets are not doing well for the safety of journalists, we go to protest after the death of a journalist but we are not doing anything special for them when they were alive and doing their job. The Indian Federation of Working Journalists also appeals to the then Union Minister of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore to announce a 'risk insurance scheme' of at least 1 cr. So that the family of journalists does not face any problem in future, but the ministry has not announced anything like that. And it is not just India's problem that we lose 12-13 journalists every year and the number is increasing day by day. day. According to data from UNESCO and other non-profit organizations, our country, India, is the third most dangerous country in the world, so it means that there are two other countries where the situations are worse than ours for journalists and journalists. And this year our neighboring country Pakistan also lost its seven journalists, which means that yes, it is not just a problem of our country, it is a universal problem that every journalist faces, in every country. We live in a time of social crisis. media in which we place all the information managed by our personal social media, so that i.