In this essay I will examine my sources to conclude whether William of Normandy's victory was brought about by tactics, luck, or Harold's shortcomings. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Before the Battle of Hastings, there were two battles: The Battle of Fulford Gate (20 September) in which Harald and Tostig faced the Northern Army of the Anglo-Saxons led by EarlMorcar and Earl Edwin (English resistance). Who surrendered only after thirty minutes and proclaimed Harald the winner of the first battle of 1066. The second significant battle is 'the battle of Stamford Bridge' on 25 September 1066. Where after a triumphant victory at FulfordGate (near the center of York) Harald orders the people of York to hand over their valuables, food and livestock on 25 September 1066. A third of Harald's fighters, including Harald, arrived at Stamford Bridge. There they were confronted by Harold Godwin (who arrived several days earlier than expected) who gave the Vikings a chance, but denied the offer: the Housecarls and Fyrd defeated Harald (about 5000 men). Unfortunately for Harald, he was hit by a fatal arrow in the throat and Tostig was massacred. Defeat for Harold Godwinson-26 September., preparation for them began in the late spring of 1066, following the death of King Edward the Confessor (5 January 1066) the three contenders to the English throne were Harald Hadrada- his claim was based on the fact that his predecessor King Magnus of Normandy had been promised the throne of England by King Harthacanute. King Edward the Confessor had called Harold Godwinson, Subregulus, this was also strengthened by the Witan. William of Normandy: related to several ancient English kings. All three were known to have experienced war and were known for their battle-worthy tactics. 1066 is a period also known for a number of important battles. On September 26, Harold and his two hundred Housecarls began their journey to London. William (the next day) sailed for Pevensey, not Dover, where Harold thought they would land. After a series of decisions, the attack of Harold Godwin, his Fyrd and Housecarls began. Harold positioned Fyrd, Archers and Housecarls on Senlac Hill, taking no risks, with Williams' men below. The Battle of Hastings had begun. During the battle, William and Harold demonstrated their skills and weaknesses. William won the Battle of Hastings thanks to one of his major strengths. As demonstrated many times, William was a witty leader, constantly adapting his strategies. An example of this, seeing how the fyrd lacked discipline, quickly launched two retreats on the track, taking advantage of the poor organization. In doing so, he created openings in the shield wall. The tactical retreat helped Williams' infantry, cavalry, and archers quickly gain control of the battle. Therefore, an example of Williams' ability to think firsthand and skill (also a short-term cause of William's victory). Another example of Williams' strengths ensuring he won the battle: As shown, William was confident but not blinded by it. An example of this: What would have happened if William hadn't won? He prepared himself, not having the advantage of being on the hill, William had them behind him: if all else failed, he and his infantry, even cavalry could retreat safely to the sea. This tests his ability to not be overconfident and yet win the battle. Yet another strong point Williams has, 1066.