Among the many studies on human behavior ever conducted, a very famous one was the one on obedience in psychology, the Milgram experiment. This was done by the psychologist Stanley Milgram, an experiment in which he focused on the complex conflict between obedience to authorities and the scope of personal conscience. He examined the justifications for genocidal actions by those accused in World War II. He found that during the Nuremberg war criminal trials, defenses were often based on "obedience", which simply meant that they were simply following orders from superiors, their intentions were not really their intentions. He wanted to answer the question: “Is it possible that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were simply following orders?” Could we call them all accomplices?' (Milgram, 1974). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay This experiment has been recreated up to 18 times and has received a lot of negative reactions since its inception due to its unethical aspects. It was labeled deceptive because participants actually believed they were electrocuting real people and were taken aback by the fact that the "student" was part of Milgram's team. It also caused a lot of exposure to stressful situations when they felt the need to continue “harming” the other person, which at some point could have caused physiological damage, as we can see, most of them were visibly distressed. Another thing was the fact that the participants were not really given the opportunity to withdraw at any time if they wanted, when they showed signs of hesitation, the official would say "please continue", "it is essential that you continue", "l 'experiment requires you to continue' or 'you have no choice, you must continue'. Despite all these and other unethical aspects, the experiment has contributed greatly to knowledge in the human sciences. We have seen and understood more human behavior in these types of circumstances. Random ordinary people, regardless of the period in which they live, are more likely to obey orders given by an authority figure, in some cases, to the point of killing innocent human beings. Obeying authorities is something in each of us from birth, and we tend to obey people if we want to recognize their moral authority as "right", even if we are deceived into believing that they are when in reality they are. Bad. From this we also learned that in society there are two types of people in similar circumstances; autonomous state ones, which are those who are able to direct their own actions and take responsibility for the results of those actions. And those of the agent state, which allow others to direct their actions and can pass responsibility for their consequences, even if such actions are ordering the will of another person. One thing to take into consideration is that the participants were all men, how do we know if the results transfer the same to females?. At some point, this experiment can be considered biased and unnecessary due to the reactions it caused, but other than that, it was a great help in studies of human behavior, even if the stress and pain they caused were not necessarily pleasant, but was essential so that it could be presented as a scientific experiment and then considered for physiological analysis. The “deception” was necessary to establish a certain stage for revelation about real reactions. It wasn't that bad, lo.