Topic > Contrast between civil liability and contractual liability

TortoThe French word 'torto' means 'wrong'. The word tort comes from the Latin word 'tortum' meaning twisted, crooked or wrong and is contrasted with the word rectum meaning straight. Tort is an act or omission that gives rise to injury or harm to another and constitutes a civil wrong for which courts impose liability. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Types of tort Actionable wrong without proof of actual damage: such as Trespass. Suppose you enter the private compound of another person, the moment you open the door and enter his compound, you commit a violation for which legal action can be taken against you even if the owner of the land has not suffered minimal damage and no actual damage done. to the earth. The act of trespassing on another's land is actionable, even if the plaintiff does not suffer the slightest harm and no actual harm is done to the law. Thus even the violation of the person, even if it is only a technical attack that does not cause any damage, gives a right to action. in these cases the law definitively presupposes the damage. Torts prosecutable only after proof of actual damage: The defendant will be liable only if as a consequence of his act the plaintiff suffers damage such as slander - It is a false and defamatory statement made orally or verbally which tends to lower the reputation of a person in the society like A says that B is suffering from leprosy. Now the statement made by a affects the reputation of B in the society due to which the society shuns him. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Criminal Tort: When an act constitutes both a wrongful act and a crime (crime), it is called a tort. For example, assault, defamation, malicious prosecution, etc. In England, before 1967, the doctrine of the fusion between tort and felony was applied. Therefore, a lawsuit could be brought under the Torts Act, unless the person is first prosecuted in a criminal court. In 1967, however, this rule was abolished in England. In India, the rule of conflation between tort and crime had never been accepted. So a person can always be sued for a wrongful act, even though the law also constitutes a crime, without first instituting criminal proceedings against him.