Obedience has undoubtedly been one of the driving forces towards human success. The development of the human race has been centered on hegemony, which remains a widely practiced means of establishing control and dominance. It therefore becomes a very important factor in achieving eudaimonia, since it is based on human action. Yes, I believe that obedience is a moral virtue as it contains the constituents that define the term itself: the disposition to behave in the right way and as a mean between the extremes of deficiency and excess, which are vices as described by Aristotle. Obedience brings humans out of chaos. By opposing nature's tendency to cause chaos and destruction, obedience helps bring order and direction. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThe Greeks in their moral philosophy describe eudaimonia to refer to the right actions that determine the well-being of an individual, thus becoming an essential value of human existence. From the military sphere, or from the education of a child, it is obedience that helps to give a certain structure and regularity to the functioning of human beings, which lies on the path left to go to achieve salvation and eudaimonia. That said, obedience can also be highly contextual. Obedience depends largely on higher authority, and authorities are very prone to being corrupt or immoral. It therefore becomes imperative to decide which virtue has greater importance: morality or obedience. Taking the example of a corrupt superior official in a company who orders his employee to undertake an immoral activity for monetary profits and corruption: the employee is obligated and bound to him by obedience, but ethics would guide him towards refusal of order, thus provoking disobedience. While obedience itself is a moral virtue, ethics and conscience should take on a higher status. This is a plausible situation in which it is morally permissible to disobey an order given by a person or institution. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a custom essay Answer the question about moral permissibility given the pharmaceutical situation in question, I believe it is morally permissible to report and report the results to an external body. Although it is an act of disobedience, it is against human ethics to continue to allow the production of such harmful drugs. Morality is, in fact, acting according to one's conscience, one's internal control. Morality in a very broad sense lies in responsibility – and the act of being responsible for the worsening health conditions of a large part of the human population is more burdensome than the act of disobedience. Here disobedience is against an immoral institution, so the factors that define obedience as a moral virtue are shaken, and ethics and conscience become more important values ​​to deny.