The claim that our universe began, but did not always exist, poses enormous challenges to scientists who do not believe that the universe was created by God. Scientists are they part of the Big Bang theory? YES. In the late 1920s, astronomer Edwin Hubble saw through his telescope that galaxies (a few million light-years away) were moving apart at fantastic speeds. This was not caused by a gravitational pull. Rather, they continued to move as a result of a primordial explosion, all coming from the same point of origin. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay At this point of origin, the entire mass of the universe was compressed to a point of infinite density. This point is smaller than a single atom. Then, in a cosmic explosion. – The Big Bang – the universe came into being. Steven Weinberg, Nobel Prize winner for physics, gives a more detailed description: “At about one hundredth of a second, the shortest time we can talk about with certainty, the temperature of the universe was about one hundred billion (x10 11 ) degrees Celsius. This is also much hotter than at the center of the hottest star, so hot in fact that none of the components of ordinary matter, molecules or atoms, or even the nuclei of atoms, could have stayed together. “And he continues, “The universe was full of light.” This is eerily parallel to the part where the Bible says, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth… and God said, 'Let there be light,' and it was light there." It did not arise from a fact, but from a pronouncement. A word said. “Be the light.” As for the sacred texts of all major religions, only the Bible describes what scientists have since discovered: there was an explosion of light and a beginning of our universe... from outside the universe itself . With it came the beginning of space, matter and time. It was a unique starting point for everything. Again and again in the book of Genesis we see the description, “And God said…” followed by “…and so it was.” Instead, could our universe have arisen through the laws of physics, such as gravity, electromagnetism, the speed of light, etc.? No, because those laws did not yet exist. The initial beginning of the universe itself produces the laws of physics, and everything began without these laws. The beginning of the universe – a singular beginning Astrophysicist Robert Jastrow, a self-described agnostic, said: “The seed of everything that happened in the Universe was planted in that first moment, every star, every planet and every living being of the universe came into existence following events that were set in motion at the moment of the cosmic explosion, it was literally the moment of Creation... The Universe appeared in a flash and we cannot know what caused it. “As has been said, this conclusion is worrying for atheist scientists. Having a reaction and not being able to document the cause is disturbing. Because it leaves no statement without foundation. Jastrow concludes: “For the scientist who lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends as a nightmare, they climbed the mountains of ignorance; they are about to conquer the highest peak, as they push to reach the final rock, they are received by a group of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries. “Imagine these scientists' relief when astronomers Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold, and Fred Hoyle advanced what became known as the “steady-state” universe in 1948. Their theory was that the universe was infinite in its age. Therefore, creation or a cause was unnecessary. The Principle of the Universe - Steady State Theory was proven false. However, in the 1960s, theSteady-state theory suffered a devastating blow when two radio engineers at Bell Labs (Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson) discovered mysterious radiation coming from space. It also came from all directions. When the temperature of the radiation was measured, its source was confirmed. This radiation does not always exist or come from one part of the universe. It comes from that particular moment, it originates in creation. Later in 1996, NASA's Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite also confirmed that background radiation signals an explosive start to the universe. The levels of hydrogen, lithium, deuterium and helium that exist in our universe today also confirms this. Are there scientists who still want to address the implications of the Big Bang theory? YES. There are scientists who are not comfortable living with: (1) an unknown cause or (2) the conclusion that God is the cause. So they opt for a third option. Other attempts to explain the origin of the universeWhat explanation do these scientists give for the beginning of all our universe, energy, time and space? It would simply be to deny the fundamental premise that science is based on the fact that everything that begins to exist must have a cause (a reaction must be caused by an action). Physicist Victor Stenger states that the universe can begin “without cause” and can “emerge from nothing.” The philosopher Bertrand Russell adopted this position in a debate on the existence of God. He said: "The universe is simply here, and that is all." It's one thing to say that something is eternal, and therefore "cause" is unnecessary. But it's totally different to scientifically look at the beginning of something, the immediate beginning of something, and then try to say it has no cause. Even David Hume, one of the most skeptical philosophers, considers this position so ridiculous. Despite his skepticism, Hume never denied causality. In 1754 Hume wrote: “I have never asserted anything so absurd as the proposition that anything can arise without a cause.” The beginning of the world - Science confirms Any theory that does not have a determining cause ends up being just a supposition, an effect of chance in the universe, something that is in total contradiction with the physical laws and order that organisms show of living beings. Nothing that is the effect of chance has such perfection. Pure and consistent scientific discoveries lead to a single conclusion: believing that the universe had a singular beginning, like an explosion, where everything we know - the universe, time, space, the scientific laws we observe - they were originated, it's absurd. however, it all had a beginning. If you have always wanted to believe in God, but certainly did not want to do so in contradiction to known scientific facts, science offers reasons to believe that God exists and that He created all things with power. It is logical to conclude that God, who is from the beginning, eternal and outside of time, created time. God who is present everywhere and cannot be confined in space, I create space. God, who is spiritual, non-physical and non-material, is the origin of our universe and all that exists. In contradiction to what the Big Bang theory proposes, God who possesses unimaginable attributes could create the universe in an instant and with the intelligent order that the universe has today. This is the message that appears repeatedly throughout the Bible. “Lift up your eyes and look at the heavens: Who created all this: You know not, you have not heard, The Lord is the everlasting God, creator of the ends of the earth” “…Because commanded and they were created." elevenThe Bible says that God formed the earth to be inhabited, with us in mind from the beginning. He gave man the breath of life, he gave man a short life on earth with him.