Justification of the RuleIf the property is taken away from free and active traffic for purposes of commerce and improvement, it will fall into disrepair and the property will become inalienable (non-transferable). Therefore, to save the property from disintegration, disuse, search, this rule is promulgated in the best interest and public order. (ii) English Law - Indian Law - Distinction Under English law, the acquisition of property could be postponed for a certain number of times and another 21 years. Article 114 allows the acquisition to be delayed beyond the lifetime of the person or persons living at the time of the death of the testator and of the minority of certain persons who will exist at the end of the period and who reaches the age of 18 years, the assets bequeathed belong.(iii) Bequests to persons affected by Articles 113 and 114First of all, it is necessary to appreciate the subtle difference between (1) related to "person" (2) related to "class" and (3) "persons who do not fall into the class if the bequest is given to "A" is related to "Person". children, some living at the time of the Testator's death and some among them, not living but born after the Testator's death. There is no doubt whether they were born before or after the Testator's death, all will be included in the "class" of children of A. But this "class" will include (1) children born after the death of the testator and (2) children born before the death of the testator Testator. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThis means that although the "class" is one, in some cases some people may be included and others may not be included. For example, the bequest is given to A's “children” living at the time of the testator's death. The 'Children' of A born after the death of the Testator will be excluded despite falling within the 'Class' of A's children. After noting the subtle difference between Legs and 'Person', Inheritance and 'Rank' and 'Persons not falling within the ' class', it is necessary to note that articles. 113 and 114, refer to bequests to persons (1) falling within or (2) not falling within a specific 'class'. The purpose of section 115 is to make it clear that "persons" (1) who fall within a certain "class" but (2) who are not affected by sections 113 and 114 will receive the inheritance. Other persons (1) in the "class" but (2) affected by sections 113 and 114 will not receive the inheritance. It can also be said that by applying articles 113 and 114, neither the will nor the legacy are annulled. The bequest(s) and the will, both are operational. What is not operational is a part of the legacy, which concerns the persons affected by sections 113 and 114. illustrations:1. Life interest is given to A. Subsequently the children of A will reach the age of 25 years. The bequest to A's children (a) born after the death of the testator and (£>) who do not reach the age of 25 within 18 years of the death of the testator (see article 117) will be inoperative. But it will be operational compared to the others.2. The life interest is given to A. Thereafter, B, C, D and all other children of A, who will be 25 years of age at the time of death (of the testator), will receive the legacy. Children B, C and D (and all others) will receive the bequest, but will have to reach the age of 25 on reaching the age of 18 (see Article 117) after the death of the testator.(iv) The subsequent bequest lapses if it fails before that.Remember : This is just an example.Request a custom paper from our expert writers now.Request a custom essayArticle 116 is also structured around the provisions of Articles 113 and 114. It states that if previous bequests are void,.