Eyewitness misidentification is the simple excuse for what a misinterpreted scene may have garnered. Witnesses to any accident are usually biased and even oblivious to what they may or may not have remembered. Honestly, this is where information is fabricated, to fit racial stereotypes or a collage of distant memories. With massive rates of innovative technological applications, this article examines traditional procedural practices that should not be standardized, but that these methods should be conflict-free (records of each case should be managed with the correct consolidated documentation), based precisely on the evidence of DNA. Likewise, action by both the federal government and police departments should reflect new methods of checklist validation by creating new stress-free anti-conviction agencies using a budget from high-cost construction projects. The conclusions are clear; rely on eyewitness statements, keep prisons open, and drain the nation's budget. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay “Eyewitness misidentification is the leading factor contributing to wrongful conviction proven by DNA testing, playing a role in more than 70% of convictions overturned DNA testing nationwide” (The Innocence Project , 2016a).The testimonies of all are in most cases unreliable and usually held in high regard due to the cost of wrongful incarcerations overturned cases makes an impartial judgment for a prosecution in determining the validation of any account. Fabrication of memories and inconsistencies in speech are all major discrepancies in relying on an eyewitness statement. This, along with a higher rate of falsified incarcerations, leads to a misleading decree in the justice system that will ultimately invent overcrowded prisons. In helping this problem with the Department of Justice, action is needed from both the federal and state governments; this action does more than just verify the validation of each account by creating new stress-free anti-conviction agencies using a budget from high-cost construction projects. These new agencies will need to ensure that traditional procedural methods are conflict-free, that DNA evidence is used as confirmation, and that all documents are handled carefully. This literature review considers that dependency and governance involves solving the problem of eyewitness misidentification by answering the following questions. What are the steps to get a "valid" eyewitness statement? What influences eyewitness testimony? How do you qualify as an expert witness? Which of the following factors should courts consider when determining whether a suspect's identification is reliable? How many people are wrongly convicted based on eyewitness testimony? Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Eyewitness misidentification has played a role in a high number of wrongful convictions and has led criminal justice experts to take a closer look at the effectiveness of identifying suspects from live and photographic recordings . (Haw, R.M., & Fisher, R.P. 2004). One of the problems.