Anarchy is a state of disorder that occurs due to the absence of a dominant power in the international system. It is a world in which there are no laws or rules dictating the behavior of the state (Tucker,1897; p.13). The idea of ​​anarchy is viewed differently depending on the theory of international relations used. A political realist believes that an anarchic society leads states to defend themselves as they seek power. While a political liberal believes that states and non-state actors can come together by creating rules and institutions that benefit the world. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Realists argue that anarchy is an insurmountable obstacle to a peaceful international system because they are concerned with their own security and the safety of the state that allows them to act on their national interests. A realist believes that states have a substantial role in international politics only when there is no central authority to control and regulate nation-states, which leads to conflicts and wars as each state aims to protect its own and survive. A central idea of ​​the realist approach to anarchy is that the rules of the international system have no central authority, meaning that anarchy is perceived as “lack of a central government to enforce the rules” and protect the states (Goldstein and Pevehouse: 2007; p. 73). The non-existence of an authority greater than nation-states leads to a self-help system perceived as “a brutal arena in which states seek opportunities to take advantage of each other” (Lebow: 2007:55 ). This may be linked to the perception that the state of anarchy will lead to conflicts and wars. These views demonstrate that realists have a largely pessimistic view of the international system (Grieco: 1988) which suggests that, as in anarchism there is an absence of an international governing body, states would pursue conflict to ensure own survival. For example, during World War II (1939-1945) the United States invaded Japan by placing atomic bombs in Hiroshima because their goal was to destroy Japan's ability to wage war, weaken its motivation to fight, and decrease its losses to the United States. The United States believed that if the enemy's goals of waging war were put to an end, then the war would be won. The United States invaded Japan only for the survival and self-help system that are central elements of a realist vision. The lack of a larger authority than nation states leads to self-help among states. Therefore, a realist view would demonstrate that anarchy would constitute an insurmountable obstacle to a peaceful international system due to the lack of a central authority. A political realist also believes that an anarchic system avoids overcoming the difficult security situation, which also means that peace in the international system is inevitable. The security dilemma refers to a situation in which a state's actions aim to improve its own security, such as increasing military power, being forced to use weapons, and forming alliances that lead other states to resort to similar measures which usually tend to increase tensions that generate conflicts. States aim to be dominant by acquiring power in order to satisfy their interest which is national survival. As states aim to improve their security, this indicates that competition between states would occur due to insecurities. Morgenthau would argue that all politics “is a struggle for power” andin the international arena this struggle “cannot be easily tamed” (Lebow: 2007:55). This argues that it is human nature to thrive for survival and power and although there have been restrictions to reduce the possibility of conflict in this struggle, without such limitations internationally war will continue to be inevitable. This view of politics in which the struggle for power is linked to security dilemmas is explained simply as “a situation in which states' actions taken to ensure their own security tend to threaten the security of other states” (Goldstein and Pevehouse: 2007:74). Realism would suggest that an anarchic international system avoids overcoming the security dilemma, which increases conflicts. The Security Dilemma has helped highlight important events such as World War I and the origins and end of the Cold War. The security dilemma occurred at the beginning of World War I when European powers felt they had to go to war due to insecurities about their neighbors' alliances despite not actually wanting war. Furthermore, the United States and the Soviet Union were competing with military weapons during the Cold War in the arms race. Although the Soviet Union and the United States never fought directly, the conflict between them indirectly led to various local wars such as the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the Soviet invasion of Hungary and Czechoslovakia. Realism holds that it is unrealistic to think that anarchy can be defeated because states will never feel protected enough to cede sovereignty to a greater authority in some form of international government that prepares them to improve their security that they can survive and feel safe. . A central element of realism is that states will increase their national powers to survive. Overall, a realist would believe that politics is primarily about domination and building security to compete with each other, which leads to conflict with other states and that is why anarchy is an insurmountable obstacle to an international system Pacific. Furthermore, a political liberalism believes that anarchy will not lead to skepticism and violence since those in the international system can overcome conflicts and wars through cooperation and joint ventures. Liberalism can be defined as the “freedom of the individual” because it accepts that human beings are moral beings in nature. The moral conviction of liberalism emphasizes human rights, individualism, freedom from authority, universality, the right to be treated equally under the protection of the law, and the duty to respect and treat others as "ethical subjects", as well as freedom of social action. (Doyle, 1983, pp.206-207; Fukuyma,1992, p.42). However, the idea that states pursue their own self-interest by combining the adoption of cooperation with the theory of realism as self-interest is a central element. Mearsheimer (1994) notes that there is no coherent war but “a relentless competition for security with the possibility of war looming in the background” (Mearsheimer,1994, p.11; Waltz,1979, p.106). States operate on a zero-sum principle because they exist in a form that requires them to pursue security, which causes the end result to be competition between states and creates the likelihood that states will cheat their way out of a alliance to gain further power. and safety. Liberal states recognize that union with other states is useful for them as it has primarily economic value in the globalized world and free trade system..