Juror n. 5…A naive and very scared young man who takes his obligations in the case seriously, but who finds it difficult to speak up when his elders have the floor. On page 36, juror no. 5 sees reasonable doubt in the case so changes his vote to not guilty. He goes on to mention the old man who lives downstairs and raises the question of whether he actually saw the boy running down the stairs. This, in turn, leads to the demonstration (led by 8) of the old man getting up and walking to the door. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Character Vocabulary: Conformist: one who goes along with expectations, rules, and tendencies Docile: obedient Unstable: unable to make decisions easily Introverted: a shy person Perspective: observant or perceptiveSubmissive: inclined or ready to submit or give in to the authority of another; unresisting or humbly obedient Humble: not proud or arrogant Juror no. 5 does not say errors, but responds to those made by others. When the jurors do not. 3 and 4 were talking about kids growing up in slums and how they were "potential threats to society" and how they were bad people, he said he had lived in slums his whole life and took what they said a bit personally . When they did the secret ballot, the no. 3 assumed that he was the one who changed his vote because of his outburst, even though he actually voted guilty. Jiuror n. 3, because of what he said about life in the slum, he thought he was sympathetic to the accused boy. Quotes: “I lived in the slum all my life... I played in a yard full of garbage. Maybe I still have the smell on me… There's something personal!” Page 21"I wanted to tell you, but you were so sure of yourself." A couple of the jurors became indignant and started yelling at me, asking why I had changed my vote. But soon, Juror 9 confessed that he had, in fact, changed his vote. And, even though Juror 3 apologized, he didn't accept it, because he didn't mean it, but no one noticed. Later, Juror 8 started asking me questions about the slums, and since I lived there, I felt very useful. I soon realized that the boy was actually innocent, so I changed my vote to "not guilty", changing the vote to 9-3, in favor of guilty. Then they decided to bring a floor plan of the apartment because no one remembered exactly where each apartment was specifically located. After he was brought in, Juror 8 quickly demonstrated that it was impossible for the old man to get up, enter the hallway, walk down the hallway to the front door, open it, and look out, all within 15 seconds, reenacting the scene, while the Juror 2 timed it. Then Juror 3 said that when a person says he is going to kill someone, he means it. However, he later became angry and shouted "Let me go! I will kill him! I will kill him!", making these same words counterproductive. The guard came in after hearing the screams, but left quickly, as the team leader said there was nothing wrong. As the discussion quieted, Juror 11 reminded us that we are fortunate to have even been able to decide the fate of the accused as a jury of twelve. We, then, had another vote to see where we were, in an open ballot, at the request of Juror 3 and Jurors 3, 4, 7, 10 and 12 voted "guilty", while Jurors 2, 6, 8 , 9, 11 and I voted “not guilty,” resulting in a vote of 6-6. After some further discussion, we decided to vote on whether we hung the jury or not. And up too!”