Topic > The Agreement Between the United States and North Korea

Index IntroductionCreating a Realistic SolutionStep by Step MethodConclusionIntroductionTo this day, and for the past 20 years, the United States' relationship with North Korea has continued to remain broken. However, recently there have been several summits and meetings between the Trump administration and the Kim regime on this very topic. So far there is no agreement on the denuclearization of North Korea or the lifting of sanctions on the nation. But that doesn't mean it's not possible to make one. We have already made progress by creating a broad debate about it and making these meetings public. The starting point for any solution is to first identify the problem, which the United States has done to a large extent. Korea has also identified what it wants in return. But so far any idea proposed by either country appears to be much more unrealistic for the other. An agreement can indeed be reached if there was a compromise between the two parties and a step-by-step process to fully achieve each of the objectives. This means partial denuclearization in exchange for partial sanctions relief. It's not the fastest way to achieve either goal, but creating a foundation is the key to a more trusting relationship, especially since the United States and North Korea have such a difficult history. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayCreating a Realistic SolutionThe Kim regime will not give up its nuclear arsenal even with the harsh sanctions imposed against him. For them, the only thing that stops them from being attacked and trampled are weapons. According to Michael Fuchs, North Korea's primary objective is regime security, and any realistic agreement should allow Korea to retain at least much of its nuclear arsenal. Pessimism is the current mindset of the Korean regime and for good reason. There are many countries surrounding them and many have nuclear infrastructures much larger than theirs. If they agreed to proceed with complete dismantling, they would give up not only their security, but also what allows them to continue trading. There is nothing to stop a foreign nation from barging in without it, and there is no reason to trust the United States as it is. Looking from the US perspective, it might appear that North Korea is making an aggressive move and has hostile intentions by building its own arsenal. But so far the Kim regime has taken no steps in this direction. For a time, the only option given to the United States was to completely denuclearize, otherwise the sanctions would not be lifted. However, there has recently been discussion of much better compromises that will benefit everyone. Daniel Depetris says a good start would be to establish a better relationship with North Korea before demanding anything from either side. For starters, they could establish a peace treaty and consider denuclearization as a long-term goal. This will allow North Korea to start trusting the United States and its intentions. Only then will Korea even think about dismantling part of its nuclear infrastructure. Right now, sanctions are indeed hurting North Korea's economy, but not to the extent the United States hoped. To date, ninety percent of North Korea's trade is with China. So imposing harsher sanctions on them will only “cause a rift with China.” Sanctions are not enough to push North Korea to do anything different. It is more harmful to.