Topic > Ways People Can Best Respond to Conflict

Imagine you are faced with a terrible, upsetting conflict. How would most people react? Would there be an aggravation? Would there be a frozen wasteland? Or even absolute joy? Of course, these are some of the ways people would react when faced with a difficult situation, but most likely the best way to respond to conflict is to remain calm and remain in a “neutral position”. To quote former President Ronald Reagan, “Peace is not the absence of conflict, it is the ability to manage conflict through peaceful means.” Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay One reason to believe approaching a conflict in a relaxed manner is because it can prevent the situation from worsening further. For example, if two siblings were to argue and keep yelling back and forth, they would encourage each other to yell even more and possibly louder. This can intensify the fight. However, if one sibling remained calm, the other sibling wouldn't really have anyone else to argue with, so the conflict would decrease. As we read in the text of the play, The Diary of Anne Frank, quoting Anne and Margot, “Anne: [violently rebellious] Margot! Margot! Margot! That's all I hear from everyone... how wonderful Margot is... "Why aren't you more like Margot?"" "Margot: [Protesting] Oh, come on, Anne, don't be so..." As mentioned in the script, Margot had maintained a calm demeanor and tried to keep Anne from arguing. It is possible that if Margot had yelled back at Anne in response, the conflict would have escalated even more resulting in a fight between Anne and Margot reads in the text of Anne Frank's Diary, Mrs. Frank states recklessly: “Mrs. Frank: [without paying attention, approaching Mrs. Van Daan] Don't think I haven't seen you! watched day after day and held my tongue. Not after this! Now I want him out of here! Day after day before, Mrs. Frank had avoided a confrontation by simply proceeding in a calm tone, but in this part of the show, Mrs. Frank had broken the silence and caused even more tension between the Van Daans and the Franks. as well as Mr. Dussel. Second, maintaining a composed attitude can prevent people from making an unreasonable decision during a heated conflict. For example, going back to what Mrs. Frank had yelled ("Mrs. Frank: [not paying attention, approaching Mrs. Van Daan] Don't think I haven't seen you! I always keep the best parts for him! I've been watching you day after day and I was silent no more! Now I want him to go!”), after having broken the silence, she had made the dangerous and unreasonable decision to remove the Van Daans from their hiding place coexist in peace, she could have avoided an outburst like this if she had calmed down and thought about her decision, but she didn't. Another example is when Peter was about to hit his father with a chair, but stopped himself realizing that he was making a bad decision. As stated in the text, “[He pushes Peter away. In his anger at his father Peter grabs a chair as if to hit him, then puts it down, burying his face in his hands…]” If Peter had hit Mr. Van Daan with a chair, Peter would surely have revealed the Franks and the Van Daans to the thief (even if the thief had already discovered the Franks and the Van Daans even if Peter had not hit his father with a chair, this would have increased even more more possibilities.