The Lone Survivor was the story of four Navy SEALs who came to Afghanistan for the operation against the Al Qaeda leader, Sharmak, who was responsible for the tragedy of World trade center. It was America's turn to act against it by capturing Sharmak. Marcus, the only survivor, recounted his horrific experiences in Afghanistan and how his friends died in the Hindu Kush mountains. During the operation, they came across three goat herders who they suspected were related to the goat herders. SEAL officers couldn't decide what to do with them, whether to execute the goat herders or let them go. They couldn't trust them. They tried to contact the head office, but they did not return the call. In the end they decided whether to let them go free or kill them. Morally, legally and strategically it was difficult to make a decision. It was a dangerous task that could even lead to their death. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayIf we consider this topic from a moral point of view, it is very wrong to kill unarmed civilians. Those goat herders were not friendly at all. Furthermore they also said that they were not Taliban, but we cannot trust them because their intentions were not clear. The goat herders are likely to tell Sharmak and his men. This would lead to serious problems in such a way that the Taliban would try to look down on the SEALS. They had only two choices: kill them and ensure their safety, or let them go and prepare to be killed by the Taliban. They could save themselves or three unarmed civilians. They were there in the name of America for blood revenge. They knew that letting the goat herders go would cost them their lives, so they have the justification to kill those unarmed civilians. However, they had no legal right to kill goat herders. Usually during a military mission, there are some decisions that soldiers make to handle the situation smoothly. Under American law they had no justification to kill the goat herders because they were unarmed. Likewise, they also have the right to save their own life. They knew they would have to spend many years in an American civilian prison with murderers and rapists if they wanted to kill goat herders. It would be better to end up in prison than be killed by the Taliban. Furthermore, if they left them there, then there would be warning signs. Furthermore, it is important that a person who does not kill but informs someone is just as dangerous as a person who kills. In this way they had the possibility of being killed kilometers away from the homeland. Other than that, to save themselves, they could have found any place and hidden the bodies, and no one would have known about the murder. And then they could have been moved from their plan to track down Al Qaeda leaders and members. It was difficult for them to let go of those goat herders during an important mission. This was the main obstacle in their mission, that's why they should have killed them. When they let the goat herders go, after a while, they should have considered the Taliban in battle because there were many Taliban with heavy weapons. Both actions, killing the goat herder and letting him go, require courage as both are dangerous. The Navy SEALS mission was ruined by those goat herders. They were not murderers but they should have killed them to save their own lives, but morally it would have been wrong. There were four SEAL officers and all were Christians. According to their religion they were not,.