Fight Club is a novel about a protagonist who is dissatisfied with his life and unconsciously creates an alter ego who engages in various activities that he had always wanted to do in his life. Written by Chuck Palahniuk, the novel, due to its gripping plot and the profound message it contains, was also produced in a film version directed by David Fincher. Starring Brad Pitt and Edward Norton, renowned movie stars, the film contains numerous thought-provoking scenes, which capture the audience's attention. However, despite its efforts to stay true to Palahniuk's message, the film adaptation lacks authenticity in conveying the main theme of liberation from the burden of social demands and thus achieving personal transformation. The film distorts the characters' true representation of Palahniuk's idea. of an individual in difficulty. Additionally, the film's plot was changed towards the end of the film, drastically changing Palahniuk's main message. Furthermore, the symbolism of soap, much emphasized in the novel, was underestimated by the film, providing few references to it. Although both the novel and the film portray similar concepts and messages, due to distortions of characters, plot, and symbols, the novel is far superior to the film version. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The novel is better than the film because Tyler's characterization aligns with the central idea of ​​identity crisis. In both the novel and the film version, Tyler plays a character with strong ideologies; however, Tyler is much darker in the novel, while Tyler is more comedic in the film. From Palahniuk's perspective, Tyler is a disturbed, perhaps absurd individual. Tyler reveals his madness when he and the narrator intentionally crash the car and make contact with the truck while Tyler recites about how God hates us that they can die at any moment, in his precise words he says: When Tyler is comical, it takes away the seriousness of his character, further distorting the theme of identity crisis. Tyler teases the audience by saying, “We're consumers. We are the byproducts of a lifestyle obsession. Murder, crime, poverty: these things do not concern me. What worries me are celebrity magazines, television (...) The audience is able to identify with the statement where, furthermore, the ending of the film differs drastically from the novel, misinterpreting the main message. The ending of the novel presents a realistic world that is not entirely pleasant. Tyler finds himself in a psychiatric hospital where he thinks he has destroyed his alter ego but in reality he does not know that he has not absorbed Tyler. The novel ends with the narrator hallucinating and believing that Project Mayhem still exists. He hears voices speaking to him: "We can't wait to have you back." The ending suggests a sense of desperation whereby the narrator is forever defeated by his alter ego unable to recover from his mental illness. On the other hand, in the film version, Jack absorbs Tyler when he shoots himself to get rid of Tyler, and becomes the dominant personality again. The scene takes place in a building where Project Mayhem plans to blow up several buildings that belong to credit card companies. Marla, Jack's girlfriend, and Jack watch them break down as he tells Marla, "You met me at a very strange time in my life." Jack and Marla reunite and the story has a happy ending. The ending of the film distorts the main idea of ​​the loss of identity in the world of consumption, which Palahniuk intended to represent. His..