The story of Genesis was about how creationists had views on how the world was created. One of my points is that God created the heavens and the earth, fully formed and functioning in six twenty-four hour days. I liked what George Grant (pastor) said in the film/documentary Is Genesis History? Because I think he has very strong language about what happened at the beginning of time like the flood because in the Bible he clearly tells us that the flood actually happened even though some people and because he knows more about how the world was created and how it took a long time and he knows there is sin in the world because of Adam and Eve. He also knows the reality of the founding fathers, how “Adam and Eve” were born. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay. I also really liked what he said, because he knows what he is saying about creationism. He is a pastor who has a Ph.D. he went to school and learned all this important information. (Evolutionists) think that the world just came into being, but in reality the world was created by God. Pastor Grant stated: “There are two good reasons why we know they were real. First, there are reliable historical accounts. Second, we can see the results of their actions in our world today. Adam and Eve are no different. Some say, however, that they were invented to perform a theological function. They want to replace the story recorded in the Bible with a different story, one that says that “Adam” and “Eve” represent our first human-like ancestors who lived millions of years ago. To say this is to deny the reality of our founding fathers. Adam and Eve are essential to understanding the history of the world. Without them, there can be no history” (Is Genesis History). Apparently, you can be both an evolutionist and a creationist because on the website they said this: “Clearly, Bill Nye is an evolutionist and Ken Ham is a creationist, with two opposing religions. “But what is the best way to describe Francis Collins' point of view? Does he have more in common with Ken Ham because they both believe in God? If so, that would make Collins more like a creationist. Or does he have more in common with Bill Nye because they both essentially have the same view of evolution?” “If that were the case, that would make him more like the evolutionist. Is the major contrast between evolutionary creation and young earth creation or between theistic and atheistic evolution" (Is Genesis History)? Keep in mind: This is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a custom essay Bill Nye is an atheist who believes in evolution from molecules to man, the Big Bang, millions of years, and a common ancestry, and who rejects the creation of the young earth, Noah's Flood, and design intelligent. Fully embraces evolutionary theory and believes that God has nothing to do with it because he rejects the idea that God exists. Francis Collins is a well-known scientist who professes to be a Christian. in the Big Bang, in millions of years and in a common ancestry, and rejects the creation of the young earth, Noah's Flood, and has been critical of intelligent design. He fully embraces evolution and argues that the evidence for evolution from molecules to man are convincing, even if we cannot observe or repeat the evolution! I think Ken Ham is a Christian who believes that God created all things in a total of six days. He doesn't like evolution from molecules to man, the Big Bang, millions of years and common ancestors. I like that he believes in the creation of the earth, in the flood of.