Georgiou offers an explanation throughout his article for this. He points out that there are a low number of studies investigating the reasons behind this. With the amount of literature found for previous empirical evidence, it would have been preferred if it were presented in a tabular format similar to the article by Duff et al. (2007). However, on a narrative level, he presented the previous empirical studies very effectively while critiquing their answers in a subtle way. Updated literature was not presented in the literature review; however, we must keep in mind that current research will not always be relevant to what the author is trying to convey. In the literature review, the author referred to a piece of citation incorrectly, indicating only the page number, in the first paragraph on page 105 of his article. Georgiou presented her research questions in the form of hypotheses in a separate section under Hypothesis Development. Hypothesis development should have been included after the introduction where this would lead to the literature review. This section contained some quotes from previous studies that would constitute Georgiou's literature review