Free will is the ability to make choices that are not controlled by fate or God, according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary. Humans are conscious beings. By proposing that people can choose different ways to respond to a condition, the involvement of free will is specified. On the other hand, while science has yet to discover new conclusions about human nature, it is proven that much of our very existence is the result of our background, education, or organic nature, factors beyond our control. Many of our choices and experiences in life have already been determined. The problem between determinism and free will is that there are solid opinions that support both sides. Prominent philosophers have passionately claimed these arguments. From observing their opinions it is clear that free will is incomplete and that within the main source of human selections there are certain elements. Schopenhauer begins his Essay on the Freedom of the Will by asking "What is freedom?". Explain that freedom is a negative perception, suggesting the absence of obstacles. There are three different types of freedom: physical, moral and intellectual. Schopenhauer sets intellectual freedom aside, so we can talk about it later. It mainly focuses on moral freedom and physical freedom. Physical freedom is the nonexistence of physical difficulties. Most of the time people think of the word freedom and connect it to animals. The important characteristic of an animal is that it is skilled in intentional movement, that is, movement that occurs according to the will. We can say an animal is free when there is no physical obstacle that prevents it from acting according to its will. Schopenhauer says: “Acc...... half of the paper ...... has explanations regarding their happiness. If this is accurate, questions about love or care will be somewhat fragile and correct. For example, he may have the intention to donate money to UNICEF, but this is not what he acknowledges with this act, as it gives his life meaning and togetherness. If Frankfurt is right that all people's motivations come from love, it may be because that rational thinking in response to truthful arguments causes reasons and love. If I can acquire the knowledge to consider people appropriately similar to me, then I could learn to extend my care and love to them too. The same “bare reason” that creates reasons is not what is shown. But it shows that “naked reason” can ultimately provide us with reasons by increasing the possibilities of our kindness and love.